|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: In light of the upcoming MySQL 5.0 release [message #25436 is a reply to message #25029] |
Thu, 13 October 2005 22:59  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
That's a good idea!
It seems a shame that people who fix the bugs would be excluded, even if
it does give some opportunity to game the system. Maybe instead there
should be two prizes - one for committers and another for the rest of us.
(I see I've reported only a paltry 194 bugs, so I'm eager to get John in
a different weight class. :)
Bob
Morten Moeller wrote:
> I like this idea a lot in general.
>
> But if you do this I don't think the one with the most should be the winner.
>
> I think it should rater be like JavaRanch's book promotions. Every valid
> entry gives you a "ticket" and you draw on random. So people with more
> valid bugs reports have a higher chance of winning, but any Joe Shmoe has
> at least a chance. If not, I don't think you encourage people outside of
> the normal bunch that already report bugs to-do this, and they/we would
> report the bugs anyway.
>
>
>
>
> John Arthorne wrote:
>
>
>>This would be a great thing to do in the months leading up to the (still
>>unnamed?) 3.2 release train. It would help build awareness and at the
>>same time help make the release more solid and bug free. It wasn't
>>clear to me how they picked a winner in the mySQL contest - presumably
>>for the most *valid* (non duplicate or invalid) bugs in the week? Bugs
>>logged by the same person who fixed the bug would also not count <g>.
>>--
>>
>>Mike Milinkovich wrote:
>>
>>>I think it's a fine idea. Should we try something like this for 3.2?
>>>
>>>"Doug Schaefer" <dschaefer@dhcp-97-130.ott.qnx.com> wrote in message
>>>news:pan.2005.09.30.18.03.25.424612@dhcp-97-130.ott.qnx.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:23:34 -0400, Eclipse WebMaster (Denis Roy) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I found this pretty cool:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://dev.mysql.com/mysql_5_contest.html
>>>>
>>>>I love it! I hope Mike saw this :)
>>>>
>>>>Doug
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03448 seconds
Home
