Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums

      Home
Home » Modeling » EMF "Technology" (Ecore Tools, EMFatic, etc)  » [Announce] EMFT OCL 1.0.0 I200602020906 is available
[Announce] EMFT OCL 1.0.0 I200602020906 is available [message #20046] Thu, 02 February 2006 11:06 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com

http://eclipse.org/emft/news/release-notes.php?version=1.0.0
http://download.eclipse.org/technology/emft/downloads/?proj= ocl
Re: [Announce] EMFT OCL 1.0.0 I200602020906 is available [message #21338 is a reply to message #20046] Fri, 03 February 2006 11:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Christian Damus wrote:
> http://eclipse.org/emft/news/release-notes.php?version=1.0.0
> http://download.eclipse.org/technology/emft/downloads/?proj= ocl
>
Are these correct?

There are no release notes.

The SDK download has no sources. Attempting to use the classes suggests that
genmodel has not been run since the signature change to eInverseAdd. The CVS
source dates appear to conform this. Derived models that offer an alternate
parent are therefore broken.

(The EMFT link on http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index_project.php is broken too.)

Regards

Ed Willink
Re: [Announce] EMFT OCL 1.0.0 I200602020906 is available [message #21347 is a reply to message #21338] Fri, 03 February 2006 12:58 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com

Hi, Ed,

The source ZIPs and Release Notes for all of the EMFT components are still
TBD. It's been quite a lot of work to commission this project; it's only
in the last two weeks that we got the publishing to Eclipse (mostly)
working.

Thanks for mentioning the need to regenerate; I have raised
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=126376 for that.

cW

Ed Willink wrote:

> Christian Damus wrote:
>> http://eclipse.org/emft/news/release-notes.php?version=1.0.0
>> http://download.eclipse.org/technology/emft/downloads/?proj= ocl
>>
> Are these correct?
>
> There are no release notes.
>
> The SDK download has no sources. Attempting to use the classes suggests
> that genmodel has not been run since the signature change to eInverseAdd.
> The CVS source dates appear to conform this. Derived models that offer an
> alternate parent are therefore broken.
>
> (The EMFT link on http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index_project.php is
> broken too.)
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
Re: [Announce] EMFT OCL 1.0.0 I200602020906 is available [message #565616 is a reply to message #20046] Fri, 03 February 2006 11:30 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Christian Damus wrote:
> http://eclipse.org/emft/news/release-notes.php?version=1.0.0
> http://download.eclipse.org/technology/emft/downloads/?proj= ocl
>
Are these correct?

There are no release notes.

The SDK download has no sources. Attempting to use the classes suggests that
genmodel has not been run since the signature change to eInverseAdd. The CVS
source dates appear to conform this. Derived models that offer an alternate
parent are therefore broken.

(The EMFT link on http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index_project.php is broken too.)

Regards

Ed Willink
Re: [Announce] EMFT OCL 1.0.0 I200602020906 is available [message #565686 is a reply to message #21338] Fri, 03 February 2006 12:58 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: cdamus.ca.ibm.com

Hi, Ed,

The source ZIPs and Release Notes for all of the EMFT components are still
TBD. It's been quite a lot of work to commission this project; it's only
in the last two weeks that we got the publishing to Eclipse (mostly)
working.

Thanks for mentioning the need to regenerate; I have raised
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=126376 for that.

cW

Ed Willink wrote:

> Christian Damus wrote:
>> http://eclipse.org/emft/news/release-notes.php?version=1.0.0
>> http://download.eclipse.org/technology/emft/downloads/?proj= ocl
>>
> Are these correct?
>
> There are no release notes.
>
> The SDK download has no sources. Attempting to use the classes suggests
> that genmodel has not been run since the signature change to eInverseAdd.
> The CVS source dates appear to conform this. Derived models that offer an
> alternate parent are therefore broken.
>
> (The EMFT link on http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index_project.php is
> broken too.)
>
> Regards
>
> Ed Willink
Previous Topic:Getting some parsing exceptions.....
Next Topic:name and type of a Variable(Declaration)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jul 16 01:12:20 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05126 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly