| probably a bug [message #16971] | 
Fri, 09 August 2002 04:45   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Originally posted by: eddy.NOSPAMaxa.it 
 
scenario: 
 
project alpha with packages: 
com.lilo.tools 
com.lilo.tools.list 
 
project beta with packages: 
com.lilo.utility 
com.lilo.utility.numbers 
 
 
Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha 
(refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already 
exists and if you want to overwrite it. 
 
The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project 
beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the complete 
paths are different. 
 
What happens, instead of this, is that packages  in project alpha ARE 
COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN. 
 
 
Edoardo
 |  
 |  
  | 
 | 
 | 
| Re: probably a bug [message #17316 is a reply to message #17290] | 
Wed, 14 August 2002 11:00   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Originally posted by: david_whiteman.oti.com 
 
If you're pretty sure it's a bug, go ahead and put it on Bugzilla.  The 
worst they can tell you is that it's not a bug, or that it's a duplicate. 
Plus, it's great for allowing others to append their thoughts or keep up 
with a bug's progress - it's actually used as a discussion group for 
specific bugs. 
 
David 
 
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message 
news:ajd5fk$10n$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place 
where 
> you can advise someone about an important bug... 
> 
> Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's 
> not a discussion group, isn't it?) 
> Edoardo 
> 
> 
> "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio 
> news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> > That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When 
you 
> do 
> > I have another "probably a bug" to tack on. 
> > 
> > Bob 
> > 
> > "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message 
> > news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> > > scenario: 
> > > 
> > > project alpha with packages: 
> > > com.lilo.tools 
> > > com.lilo.tools.list 
> > > 
> > > project beta with packages: 
> > > com.lilo.utility 
> > > com.lilo.utility.numbers 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project 
alpha 
> > > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha 
already 
> > > exists and if you want to overwrite it. 
> > > 
> > > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from 
project 
> > > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the 
> complete 
> > > paths are different. 
> > > 
> > > What happens, instead of this, is that packages  in project alpha ARE 
> > > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Edoardo 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>
 |  
 |  
  | 
| Re: probably a bug [message #572654 is a reply to message #16971] | 
Fri, 09 August 2002 15:01   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com 
 
That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When you do 
I have another "probably a bug" to tack on. 
 
Bob 
 
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message 
news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> scenario: 
> 
> project alpha with packages: 
> com.lilo.tools 
> com.lilo.tools.list 
> 
> project beta with packages: 
> com.lilo.utility 
> com.lilo.utility.numbers 
> 
> 
> Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha 
> (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already 
> exists and if you want to overwrite it. 
> 
> The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project 
> beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the complete 
> paths are different. 
> 
> What happens, instead of this, is that packages  in project alpha ARE 
> COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN. 
> 
> 
> Edoardo 
> 
>
 |  
 |  
  | 
| Re: probably a bug [message #572967 is a reply to message #17059] | 
Wed, 14 August 2002 04:54   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Originally posted by: eddy.NOSPAMaxa.it 
 
Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place where 
you can advise someone about an important bug... 
 
Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's 
not a discussion group, isn't it?) 
Edoardo 
 
 
"Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When you 
do 
> I have another "probably a bug" to tack on. 
> 
> Bob 
> 
> "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message 
> news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> > scenario: 
> > 
> > project alpha with packages: 
> > com.lilo.tools 
> > com.lilo.tools.list 
> > 
> > project beta with packages: 
> > com.lilo.utility 
> > com.lilo.utility.numbers 
> > 
> > 
> > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha 
> > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already 
> > exists and if you want to overwrite it. 
> > 
> > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project 
> > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the 
complete 
> > paths are different. 
> > 
> > What happens, instead of this, is that packages  in project alpha ARE 
> > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN. 
> > 
> > 
> > Edoardo 
> > 
> > 
> 
>
 |  
 |  
  | 
| Re: probably a bug [message #573000 is a reply to message #17290] | 
Wed, 14 August 2002 11:00   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
If you're pretty sure it's a bug, go ahead and put it on Bugzilla.  The 
worst they can tell you is that it's not a bug, or that it's a duplicate. 
Plus, it's great for allowing others to append their thoughts or keep up 
with a bug's progress - it's actually used as a discussion group for 
specific bugs. 
 
David 
 
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message 
news:ajd5fk$10n$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place 
where 
> you can advise someone about an important bug... 
> 
> Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's 
> not a discussion group, isn't it?) 
> Edoardo 
> 
> 
> "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio 
> news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> > That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When 
you 
> do 
> > I have another "probably a bug" to tack on. 
> > 
> > Bob 
> > 
> > "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message 
> > news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com... 
> > > scenario: 
> > > 
> > > project alpha with packages: 
> > > com.lilo.tools 
> > > com.lilo.tools.list 
> > > 
> > > project beta with packages: 
> > > com.lilo.utility 
> > > com.lilo.utility.numbers 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project 
alpha 
> > > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha 
already 
> > > exists and if you want to overwrite it. 
> > > 
> > > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from 
project 
> > > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the 
> complete 
> > > paths are different. 
> > > 
> > > What happens, instead of this, is that packages  in project alpha ARE 
> > > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Edoardo 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>
 |  
 |  
  | 
Powered by 
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04528 seconds