Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » JBossIDE strange packaging
JBossIDE strange packaging [message #143021] Mon, 10 October 2005 04:50 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: thisisnot.mymail.com

I've been looking the trailblazer demos of the JBossIDE that's based on
WTP. Does anyone know why they decided to have these packaging wizards
instead of dividing the project into separate modules like WTP? If we do
the WTP way, will we have to convert later (we are JBossAS oriented
and need some JBossIDE's goodies) and will it be possible to do it
later? (this is for JBossIDE developers if they follow this newsgroup)

http://trailblazer.demo.jboss.com/IDETrail/ejb3/packaging/
Re: JBossIDE strange packaging [message #143099 is a reply to message #143021] Tue, 11 October 2005 10:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
I think the JBoss devellpers are infact on a transition plan to WTP..

Signs of this:

-1.5 JbossIDE moved xml and etc to using WTP editors
Re: JBossIDE strange packaging [message #144618 is a reply to message #143021] Thu, 20 October 2005 03:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:50:14 +0200, Srgjan Srepfler <thisisnot@mymail.com>
wrote:

> I've been looking the trailblazer demos of the JBossIDE that's based on
> WTP. Does anyone know why they decided to have these packaging wizards
> instead of dividing the project into separate modules like WTP? If we do
> the WTP way, will we have to convert later (we are JBossAS oriented
> and need some JBossIDE's goodies) and will it be possible to do it
> later? (this is for JBossIDE developers if they follow this newsgroup)
>

Any reason why you dont ask this on the jboss ide dev forum ? ;)

but anyway - the packaging wizards has a big advantage over the separate
modules
WTP support and that is it can be used with *any* project layout -
including WTP.

We are looking into (and very open to suggestions/corrections etc.) how we
can integrate
this well/better with WTP.

But please do that on the jboss ide dev forum since we don't monitor these
forums
daily for jbosside dev specific questions.

/max
Re: JBossIDE strange packaging [message #144637 is a reply to message #144618] Thu, 20 October 2005 07:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: thisisnot.mymail.com

We'd be glad to, can you give us a link to the JBossIDE forum?

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:50:14 +0200, Srgjan Srepfler
> <thisisnot@mymail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been looking the trailblazer demos of the JBossIDE that's based
>> on WTP. Does anyone know why they decided to have these packaging
>> wizards instead of dividing the project into separate modules like
>> WTP? If we do the WTP way, will we have to convert later (we are
>> JBossAS oriented and need some JBossIDE's goodies) and will it be
>> possible to do it later? (this is for JBossIDE developers if they
>> follow this newsgroup)
>>
>
> Any reason why you dont ask this on the jboss ide dev forum ? ;)
>
> but anyway - the packaging wizards has a big advantage over the
> separate modules
> WTP support and that is it can be used with *any* project layout -
> including WTP.
>
> We are looking into (and very open to suggestions/corrections etc.) how
> we can integrate
> this well/better with WTP.
>
> But please do that on the jboss ide dev forum since we don't monitor
> these forums
> daily for jbosside dev specific questions.
>
> /max
Re: JBossIDE strange packaging [message #144749 is a reply to message #144637] Thu, 20 October 2005 13:31 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewforum&a mp;f=162

/max

> We'd be glad to, can you give us a link to the JBossIDE forum?
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:50:14 +0200, Srgjan Srepfler
>> <thisisnot@mymail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been looking the trailblazer demos of the JBossIDE that's based
>>> on WTP. Does anyone know why they decided to have these packaging
>>> wizards instead of dividing the project into separate modules like
>>> WTP? If we do the WTP way, will we have to convert later (we are
>>> JBossAS oriented and need some JBossIDE's goodies) and will it be
>>> possible to do it later? (this is for JBossIDE developers if they
>>> follow this newsgroup)
>>>
>> Any reason why you dont ask this on the jboss ide dev forum ? ;)
>> but anyway - the packaging wizards has a big advantage over the
>> separate modules
>> WTP support and that is it can be used with *any* project layout -
>> including WTP.
>> We are looking into (and very open to suggestions/corrections etc.)
>> how we can integrate
>> this well/better with WTP.
>> But please do that on the jboss ide dev forum since we don't monitor
>> these forums
>> daily for jbosside dev specific questions.
>> /max
>



--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Previous Topic:Strange Errors?
Next Topic:issue with XDocletBuilder
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Apr 30 16:40:34 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03286 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top