| buf or feature? empty window [message #131128] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 14:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
hello all,
try the following with sdk 3.3M1:
- create an empty java project
- create a visual class, choose swt shell and let it create a main method
- put a composite on the shell in the java beans view
-> the shell window visually changes its' position (why that?)
this only happens if u add the composite in the bean view
- put a label in the composite
- start the little app with alt+shift+x j
-> an empty shell shows up (where is my label?)
is this caused by wrong use?
cu,
michael
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #131452 is a reply to message #131426] |
Tue, 26 September 2006 08:04  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: michael.dev.NO_SPAM.gmx.de
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:31 -0400, Rich Kulp wrote:
> It depends on who you talk to. :-) In the beginning we had the two panes
> as the default. We were asked over and over to make the split pane the
> default, so we did.
Ok, convinced.. :)
|
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #614648 is a reply to message #131224] |
Fri, 22 September 2006 03:02 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello Rich,
thanks for your answer. One more idea I have for ve. Normally I work wth
ve and code in separate tabs instead of a split pane. I think this is even
a better default, because in my opinion a split pane neither gives you
enough space for visual editing nor for code. The idea is, if you double
click on an event in the java beans view it should switch to the source
tab and jump to the code position of the according event. In a preference
you could even define an option to jump to the code section and the source
tab when an event is added (this should be really an option not a general
behaviour).
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:19:34 -0400, Rich Kulp wrote:
> Could you please append the generated code?
Here you are (I removed the comments but everything
else is pure class wizard & ve generated):
import org.eclipse.swt.layout.GridLayout;
import org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Point;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Shell;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite;
import org.eclipse.swt.SWT;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Label;
public class MissingLabelSample {
private Shell sShell = null;
private Composite composite = null;
private Label label = null;
private void createComposite() {
composite = new Composite(sShell, SWT.NONE);
composite.setLayout(new GridLayout());
label = new Label(composite, SWT.NONE);
label.setText("Run the app and you won't see me");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Display display = Display.getDefault();
MissingLabelSample thisClass = new MissingLabelSample();
thisClass.createSShell();
thisClass.sShell.open();
while (!thisClass.sShell.isDisposed()) {
if (!display.readAndDispatch())
display.sleep();
}
display.dispose();
}
private void createSShell() {
sShell = new Shell();
sShell.setText("Shell");
createComposite();
sShell.setSize(new Point(300, 200));
sShell.setLayout(new GridLayout());
}
}
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #614650 is a reply to message #131312] |
Fri, 22 September 2006 04:42 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Here it is again... better formatted
import org.eclipse.swt.layout.GridLayout;
import org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Point;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Shell;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite;
import org.eclipse.swt.SWT;
import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Label;
public class MissingLabelSample {
private Shell sShell = null;
private Composite composite = null;
private Label label = null;
private void createComposite() {
composite = new Composite(sShell, SWT.NONE); composite.setLayout(new
GridLayout()); label = new Label(composite, SWT.NONE);
label.setText("Run the app and you won't see me");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Display display = Display.getDefault(); MissingLabelSample thisClass =
new MissingLabelSample(); thisClass.createSShell();
thisClass.sShell.open();
while (!thisClass.sShell.isDisposed()) {
if (!display.readAndDispatch())
display.sleep();
}
display.dispose();
}
private void createSShell() {
sShell = new Shell();
sShell.setText("Shell");
createComposite();
sShell.setSize(new Point(300, 200));
sShell.setLayout(new GridLayout());
}
}
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #614653 is a reply to message #131312] |
Fri, 22 September 2006 10:42 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com
Two windows are already available. There is a VE option on the
Window->Preferences->Java->Visual Editor to switch to using a tab pane
with two windows instead of a split pane.
|
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #614657 is a reply to message #131367] |
Mon, 25 September 2006 02:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Rich Kulp wrote:
> Two windows are already available. There is a VE option on the
> Window->Preferences->Java->Visual Editor to switch to using a tab pane
> with two windows instead of a split pane.
I know that thank you. I was just thinking it is a better default setting.
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #614658 is a reply to message #131414] |
Mon, 25 September 2006 11:08 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com
It depends on who you talk to. :-) In the beginning we had the two panes
as the default. We were asked over and over to make the split pane the
default, so we did.
Michael wrote:
> Rich Kulp wrote:
>
>> Two windows are already available. There is a VE option on the
>> Window->Preferences->Java->Visual Editor to switch to using a tab pane
>> with two windows instead of a split pane.
>
> I know that thank you. I was just thinking it is a better default setting.
|
|
|
| Re: buf or feature? empty window [message #614660 is a reply to message #131426] |
Tue, 26 September 2006 08:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:31 -0400, Rich Kulp wrote:
> It depends on who you talk to. :-) In the beginning we had the two panes
> as the default. We were asked over and over to make the split pane the
> default, so we did.
Ok, convinced.. :)
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09917 seconds
Home