| Architecture of Logic example [message #85534] |
Thu, 26 June 2003 11:12  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rahul.dhar.intel.com
Going through the code for the logic example, I am wondering why it was
designed this way. There are tons of files (around 90 or 100 I think),
and at least that many classes. Why was it designed this way? Was it for
modularity, extensibility, or just for the sake of example? Since the
application I need to make is very similar (a block diagram editor), I am
wondering whether I should use the logic example as starter code (it seems
like I just need to put in my components instead of the LEDs, etc), or if
I should start from scratch.
-Rahul
|
|
|
| Re: Architecture of Logic example [message #85569 is a reply to message #85534] |
Thu, 26 June 2003 12:51  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
"Rahul Dhar" <rahul.dhar@intel.com> wrote in message
news:bdf2hn$j6q$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Going through the code for the logic example, I am wondering why it was
> designed this way. There are tons of files (around 90 or 100 I think),
Besides being an example, the logic editor is how we test almost every line
of code in GEF.
> and at least that many classes. Why was it designed this way? Was it for
> modularity, extensibility, or just for the sake of example? Since the
> application I need to make is very similar (a block diagram editor), I am
> wondering whether I should use the logic example as starter code (it seems
> like I just need to put in my components instead of the LEDs, etc), or if
> I should start from scratch.
It depends on what your end goal is. If you are developing a product, you
should probably take the time to start from scratch and learn each step
involved. Article to follow...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Architecture of Logic example [message #87252 is a reply to message #85569] |
Tue, 15 July 2003 10:31 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: kgilmer.antennasoftware.com
I'm still getting my feet wet with GEF and am wondering if there has been
any progess on this article...
"Randy Hudson" <none@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:bdf89r$p8s$1@rogue.oti.com...
>
> "Rahul Dhar" <rahul.dhar@intel.com> wrote in message
> news:bdf2hn$j6q$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > Going through the code for the logic example, I am wondering why it was
> > designed this way. There are tons of files (around 90 or 100 I think),
>
> Besides being an example, the logic editor is how we test almost every
line
> of code in GEF.
>
> > and at least that many classes. Why was it designed this way? Was it
for
> > modularity, extensibility, or just for the sake of example? Since the
> > application I need to make is very similar (a block diagram editor), I
am
> > wondering whether I should use the logic example as starter code (it
seems
> > like I just need to put in my components instead of the LEDs, etc), or
if
> > I should start from scratch.
>
> It depends on what your end goal is. If you are developing a product, you
> should probably take the time to start from scratch and learn each step
> involved. Article to follow...
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Architecture of Logic example [message #87328 is a reply to message #87252] |
Tue, 15 July 2003 12:00 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
IT is being published on the 29th to a website. The link will be added to
the GEF homepage.
"Ken Gilmer" <kgilmer@antennasoftware.com> wrote in message
news:bf139k$ps3$1@eclipse.org...
> I'm still getting my feet wet with GEF and am wondering if there has been
> any progess on this article...
>
> "Randy Hudson" <none@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:bdf89r$p8s$1@rogue.oti.com...
> >
> > "Rahul Dhar" <rahul.dhar@intel.com> wrote in message
> > news:bdf2hn$j6q$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > > Going through the code for the logic example, I am wondering why it
was
> > > designed this way. There are tons of files (around 90 or 100 I
think),
> >
> > Besides being an example, the logic editor is how we test almost every
> line
> > of code in GEF.
> >
> > > and at least that many classes. Why was it designed this way? Was it
> for
> > > modularity, extensibility, or just for the sake of example? Since the
> > > application I need to make is very similar (a block diagram editor), I
> am
> > > wondering whether I should use the logic example as starter code (it
> seems
> > > like I just need to put in my components instead of the LEDs, etc), or
> if
> > > I should start from scratch.
> >
> > It depends on what your end goal is. If you are developing a product,
you
> > should probably take the time to start from scratch and learn each step
> > involved. Article to follow...
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04406 seconds
Home