Guidelines about plugin refactorization and OSGi services vs. extension points. [message #79685] |
Wed, 20 December 2006 05:20  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
If I remember corretly, during Eclipse Server Side Symposium at Eclipse
Summit Europe, Jeff McAffer said that some guidlines about pluin
refactorization (when should be consolidated / split) and OSGi services
vs. extension points comparison would be published at Equinox web pages.
I took a look on both Equinox web pages and wiki and I didn't find them.
Are they maybe published somewhere?
Regards,
Marcin
|
|
|
|
Re: Guidelines about plugin refactorization and OSGi services vs. extension points. [message #79760 is a reply to message #79745] |
Thu, 21 December 2006 08:48  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
The "best practices" is probably the closest to the one I look for. In
general we are now doing some plugin refactorization and it would be
good to read some ideas from more experienced developers. But if it is
not there ready and waiting, do not bother with it.
Thanks a lot for links.
Marcin Okraszewski
Jeff McAffer napisał(a):
> Hmmm, not sure I recall this part of the conversation... However, I
> might have been refering to several different things.
> - Orbit best practices (still evoloving) see
> http://eclipse.org/orbit
> - EclipseCon 06 talk on programming best practices
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/2006/Sub.do?id=185
> - there are versioning best practices
> http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/documents/plugin-versioning.h tml
>
> Am I getting warm?
>
> Jeff
>
> Marcin Okraszewski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> If I remember corretly, during Eclipse Server Side Symposium at
>> Eclipse Summit Europe, Jeff McAffer said that some guidlines about
>> pluin refactorization (when should be consolidated / split) and OSGi
>> services vs. extension points comparison would be published at Equinox
>> web pages.
>>
>> I took a look on both Equinox web pages and wiki and I didn't find
>> them. Are they maybe published somewhere?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marcin
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05797 seconds