| Voice Tools Development Call Minutes: August 25, 2005 [message #6826] |
Thu, 25 August 2005 12:00 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Eclipse Voice Tools Development Call Minutes
August 25, 2005, 11am EST
Attendees:
Ross Yakulis, Avaya
Frederic Gloppe, HP
Brent D. Metz, IBM
John Muller, Nortel
Jeff Pedigo, SandCherry
Andrew Wahbe, VoiceGenie
The call began with a discussion of the status of the project's ascention to
the release phase. It was stated that since
it is taking longer than initially planned to be brought to the Technology
PMC there is still time to modify plans to
incorporate additional contributions.
A discussion of the plans was started by detailing the contents of the
Project plan. There were no comments on the project
plan. The milestone plan was reviewed. It was commented that the launching
of the web project was not part of the plan and
a discussion of how web launching integration with the WTP components would
occur. An action item to resolve with the WTP how
web browsers are launched following the launch of a web project and how a
VoiceXML execution API could be alternatively
plugged in and what criteria would cause that to occur.
A discussion of the Execution APIs began and recieved no comments. It was
stated that the APIs need further review from
VoiceXML browser developers to validate that the API is usable by a wide
variety of vendors.
Recognition APIs were discussed with the main topic of discussion being how
to target a generic recognizer. It was stated
that since MRCP is essentially a technology-neutral layer amongst
recognition APIs that such a generic recognizer API should
strive to follow MRCP's functions closely. A discussion of how to advertise
function sets began. It was agreed that initial
APIs should focus on SRGS functionality for things like testing grammars as
there is no current editing or conversion support
for other grammar languages.
The call ended with a notice that there is a scheduling conflict with the
next call and that issues should be discussed for the
week on the mailing list instead.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03646 seconds
Home