Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Newcomers » Newcomers » 3.1 together with 3.0.2
3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #71958] Wed, 01 June 2005 11:48 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: hendrik_maryns.despammed.com

Hi,

I'm very satisfied of Eclipse 3.0.2 for my Java programming until now,
but I would like to be able to use the 1.5 syntax. I understand that I
need to download the 3.1 Milestone version for that. The problem is: I
also use the Omondo UML-plugin, which explicitly states it needs the 3.0
branch. So the question is: Can I install 3.1 without removing 3.0.2,
and use them both at the same time? I would then use 3.1 for editing my
files, and 3.0.2 for building a nice UML-scheme out of it.

Anybody have any experience with this?

Basically:
- can 3.1 and 3.0.2 exist together on one machine?
- if yes, can they share the same workspace?
- does Omondo Umlplugin work with 3.1?

Cheers, H.
--
Hendrik Maryns

Interesting websites:
www.lieverleven.be (I cooperate)
www.eu04.com European Referendum Campaign
aouw.org The Art Of Urban Warfare
Re: 3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #71977 is a reply to message #71958] Wed, 01 June 2005 12:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: plankton.softwitch.net

Eclipse dont use any window's registry, so you can use both version of
eclipse in same time. just extract another copy to another folder. and
run it.

Hendrik Maryns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very satisfied of Eclipse 3.0.2 for my Java programming until now,
> but I would like to be able to use the 1.5 syntax. I understand that I
> need to download the 3.1 Milestone version for that. The problem is: I
> also use the Omondo UML-plugin, which explicitly states it needs the 3.0
> branch. So the question is: Can I install 3.1 without removing 3.0.2,
> and use them both at the same time? I would then use 3.1 for editing my
> files, and 3.0.2 for building a nice UML-scheme out of it.
>
> Anybody have any experience with this?
>
> Basically:
> - can 3.1 and 3.0.2 exist together on one machine?
> - if yes, can they share the same workspace?
> - does Omondo Umlplugin work with 3.1?
>
> Cheers, H.
Re: 3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #71993 is a reply to message #71958] Wed, 01 June 2005 12:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
"Hendrik Maryns" <hendrik_maryns@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:d7kllj$lrv$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Can I install 3.1 without removing 3.0.2,
> and use them both at the same time?
> - can 3.1 and 3.0.2 exist together on one machine?
Yes, just put them in tow separate directories.

>I would then use 3.1 for editing my
> files, and 3.0.2 for building a nice UML-scheme out of it.
Yes, but...

> - if yes, can they share the same workspace?
....but sharing workspace may take you into problems....
1st a workspace cannot be used at the same time by two running instances of
Eclipse.
Then, under a workspace, you have a set of cached informations, like
preferences.
Formats may have change between the 3.02 and 3.1 version.
And at the minimum if they have not changed, the internal format for indices
have hanged, so it would trigger a rebuild each time you are attaching a
workspace to a different version of Eclipse.
In practice, you are using some team repository like CVS, I would ratherr
set-up two wokspaces: one for each version of Eclipse, and share the info
between the wo via the team repo.
Just to be on the safe side, and avoid weird unsupported things.
I am pretty sure that worksapce are not backward compatible, but I may be
wrong.
I know I have been using 3.0.X workspaces with latest 3.1 milestones back
and forth, but I would not recommend to try this at home :-)

> - does Omondo Umlplugin work with 3.1?
That is a question for Vladimir!
Not AFAIK per their web site.
But I would give it a spin... Now it may not work not because of Omondo
itself but also because of other components like GEF, EMF, and UML2 Omondo
depends on.
And encourage Omondo to release soon a 3.1 version, which they will surely
do once 3.1 is final in a few weeks!
Now the other question is: does Omondo support Java 5?
Once again a question for them!
Re: 3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #72049 is a reply to message #71993] Wed, 01 June 2005 12:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: hendrik_maryns.despammed.com

Philippe Ombredanne uitte de volgende tekst op 1/06/2005 18:32:
> "Hendrik Maryns" <hendrik_maryns@despammed.com> wrote in message
> news:d7kllj$lrv$1@news.eclipse.org...
>
>>Can I install 3.1 without removing 3.0.2,
>>and use them both at the same time?
>>- can 3.1 and 3.0.2 exist together on one machine?
>
> Yes, just put them in tow separate directories.
>
>
>>I would then use 3.1 for editing my
>>files, and 3.0.2 for building a nice UML-scheme out of it.
>
> Yes, but...
>
>
>>- if yes, can they share the same workspace?
>
> ...but sharing workspace may take you into problems....
> 1st a workspace cannot be used at the same time by two running instances of
> Eclipse.
> Then, under a workspace, you have a set of cached informations, like
> preferences.
> Formats may have change between the 3.02 and 3.1 version.
> And at the minimum if they have not changed, the internal format for indices
> have hanged, so it would trigger a rebuild each time you are attaching a
> workspace to a different version of Eclipse.
> In practice, you are using some team repository like CVS, I would ratherr
> set-up two wokspaces: one for each version of Eclipse, and share the info
> between the wo via the team repo.

I'm working on this all alone, so didn't use CVS till now, can you give
me some hints on how to do this? I'm on WinXP SP2.

> Just to be on the safe side, and avoid weird unsupported things.
> I am pretty sure that worksapce are not backward compatible, but I may be
> wrong.
> I know I have been using 3.0.X workspaces with latest 3.1 milestones back
> and forth, but I would not recommend to try this at home :-)

I would if this weren't a project which has to be finished by monday
morning, and which counts as an exam of programming...

>>- does Omondo Umlplugin work with 3.1?
>
> That is a question for Vladimir!
> Not AFAIK per their web site.
> But I would give it a spin... Now it may not work not because of Omondo
> itself but also because of other components like GEF, EMF, and UML2 Omondo
> depends on.
> And encourage Omondo to release soon a 3.1 version, which they will surely
> do once 3.1 is final in a few weeks!
> Now the other question is: does Omondo support Java 5?
> Once again a question for them!

Ah, I think you hit the weak spot there...

Thanks, H.

--
Hendrik Maryns

Interesting websites:
www.lieverleven.be (I cooperate)
www.eu04.com European Referendum Campaign
aouw.org The Art Of Urban Warfare
Re: 3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #72141 is a reply to message #72049] Wed, 01 June 2005 13:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Hendrik Maryns" <hendrik_maryns@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:d7kllj$lrv$1@news.eclipse.org...

> I'm working on this all alone, so didn't use CVS till now, can you give
> me some hints on how to do this? I'm on WinXP SP2.
> I would if this weren't a project which has to be finished by monday
> morning, and which counts as an exam of programming...
Forget about CVS for now if you are new to it.
It will only make you late!

My 2 cents.
Make a backup copy of your workspaces each time when you you make switches.
And you should be fine.

> Ah, I think you hit the weak spot there...
Note that 3.1 is not final yet, so not supporting it yet as a commercial
vendor makes sense somehow :-)
Re: 3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #72619 is a reply to message #72141] Thu, 02 June 2005 13:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: eclipse.rizzoweb.com

Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> Hendrik Maryns" <hendrik_maryns@despammed.com> wrote in message
> news:d7kllj$lrv$1@news.eclipse.org...
>
>
>>I'm working on this all alone, so didn't use CVS till now, can you give
>>me some hints on how to do this? I'm on WinXP SP2.
>>I would if this weren't a project which has to be finished by monday
>>morning, and which counts as an exam of programming...
>
> Forget about CVS for now if you are new to it.
> It will only make you late!
>
> My 2 cents.
> Make a backup copy of your workspaces each time when you you make switches.
> And you should be fine.

I doubt that will work - 3.1 has a lot of differences that are likely to
make the workspace sour to 3.0. My recommendation is to install 3.1 into
a separate location and using a separate workspace than 3.0. Then set up
a Project in each one (3.0 and 3.1) with the source locations set to the
same external (linked) directory. That way you can work in both 3.0 and
3.1 but maintain only one source directory. You will have to make to
sure to manually force a refresh on each Project after you change it in
the other Eclipse, but it should be workable for a short-term solution.

HTH,
Eric
Re: 3.1 together with 3.0.2 [message #72749 is a reply to message #72619] Thu, 02 June 2005 14:46 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Very nice !

"Eric Rizzo" <eclipse@rizzoweb.com> wrote in message
news:d7nfpa$8ef$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > Hendrik Maryns" <hendrik_maryns@despammed.com> wrote in message
> > news:d7kllj$lrv$1@news.eclipse.org...
> >
> >
> >>I'm working on this all alone, so didn't use CVS till now, can you give
> >>me some hints on how to do this? I'm on WinXP SP2.
> >>I would if this weren't a project which has to be finished by monday
> >>morning, and which counts as an exam of programming...
> >
> > Forget about CVS for now if you are new to it.
> > It will only make you late!
> >
> > My 2 cents.
> > Make a backup copy of your workspaces each time when you you make
switches.
> > And you should be fine.
>
> I doubt that will work - 3.1 has a lot of differences that are likely to
> make the workspace sour to 3.0. My recommendation is to install 3.1 into
> a separate location and using a separate workspace than 3.0. Then set up
> a Project in each one (3.0 and 3.1) with the source locations set to the
> same external (linked) directory. That way you can work in both 3.0 and
> 3.1 but maintain only one source directory. You will have to make to
> sure to manually force a refresh on each Project after you change it in
> the other Eclipse, but it should be workable for a short-term solution.
>
> HTH,
> Eric
Previous Topic:SSHExec ant task bug
Next Topic:yellow background on selected objects in RC1
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 11 10:06:23 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09200 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top