Is RAP Production Ready? [message #66995] |
Wed, 19 December 2007 02:43  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: anupgokhale.rediffmail.com
The Eclipse RAP project looks very promising indeed. I am aware that the
version 1.0 of RAP is out. However is this version production ready? I
know that it will take at least a couple of more versions for RAP to
mature. But is the version 1.0 stable enough(no major bugs etc) to be used
in an actual project?
I have also noticed that there is not much excitement and activity in the
community/blog world for RAP.
Regards,
Anup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Is RAP Production Ready? [message #67124 is a reply to message #67092] |
Thu, 20 December 2007 04:49  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
this is not right. The qooxdoo library itself is mainly developed by
"1und1", RAP is mainly developed by Innoopract engineers (and hopefully
some other contributors out here in the future). But I see Stefans point
that RAP depends heavily on Qooxdoo at the moment. For the next release
we want to split RAP into two parts. On the one side the lifecycle et al
and on the other side the client side technology to render the UI. In
general we want to bring the developers the same freedom as SWT has by
having fragments for each rendering engine (SWT: GTK, Win32, Vista,
Motif, etc - RWT: Qooxdoo, other JS Framework, Flash, whatever). There
are no plans yet to have another frontend technology - we just want to
open up the possibility so that the community can itself implement a new
rendering engine.
Hope that helped to have a better overview.
Greets
Benny
Markus Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Another risk which I see in the RAP technology stack is dependency to
>> qooxdoo wich is used for Browser-side rendering. If the further
>> depevelopment of qooxdoo slows down or even halts this might have a
>> serious impact on RAP (take the memory problem or several open bugs
>> which depend on qooxdoo as example).
>>
> as far as I know qooxdoo is maily developed by the same company who
> develops and contributed RAP. So this should be no problem.
>
> Markus
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.22853 seconds