automatic .gmfmap validation and decoration? [message #66466] |
Fri, 20 October 2006 10:22  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Probably a stupid question: can one enable automatic validation?
When the validation fails (as part of the .gmfgen generation), ones
currently has to to do a lengthy manual tree search like procedure to
figure out, where and which element one has got wrong. It would be cute,
if the validation would automatically directly anotate or "decorate" any
offending line in the treeview so that one would be aware that
something's fishy right away.
But I guess that's already on your to do list, isn't it?
Michael
|
|
|
|
Re: automatic .gmfmap validation and decoration? [message #66529 is a reply to message #66508] |
Fri, 20 October 2006 11:10  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ah - that had escaped my attention.
Thanks!
"Radek Dvorak" <radek.dvorak@borland.com> wrote in message
news:ehankf$83g$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hi Michael,
>
> If validation fails (as part of the .gmfgen generation) you can
> execute GMFGen Editor/Validate or GMFMap Editor/Validate action.
> Both produce validation markers in the 'Problems View' which allow to
> navigate to the affected elements in the model tree view.
>
> Regards,
> /Radek
>
>
> "Michael Moser" <mmo@zurich.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:eham3s$vhm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>> Probably a stupid question: can one enable automatic validation?
>>
>> When the validation fails (as part of the .gmfgen generation), ones
>> currently has to to do a lengthy manual tree search like procedure to
>> figure out, where and which element one has got wrong. It would be
>> cute, if the validation would automatically directly anotate or
>> "decorate" any offending line in the treeview so that one would be
>> aware that something's fishy right away.
>>
>> But I guess that's already on your to do list, isn't it?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03458 seconds