| why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2) [message #64222] |
Sun, 10 December 2006 10:23  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
I am curious why the JET syntax changed from JET1 to JET2.
I always liked the simplicity of the JET1 syntax and see no obvious reason
to move to
an XML-like syntax, moving away from a well known JSP-like template
language.
Bye
Victor
PS:
could you please reply to
v.volle _ at _ computer.org
as well
|
|
|
| Re: why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2) [message #64245 is a reply to message #64222] |
Mon, 11 December 2006 08:12  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Victor:
The JET2 syntax changes were made to support tag library support.
That said, I am working on integrating 100% compatibility with the JET1
syntax, and most importantly, compatibility with the generated Java classes.
Paul
"Victor Volle" <v.volle@computer.org> wrote in message
news:elh8nd$6ga$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> I am curious why the JET syntax changed from JET1 to JET2.
> I always liked the simplicity of the JET1 syntax and see no obvious reason
> to move to
> an XML-like syntax, moving away from a well known JSP-like template
> language.
>
> Bye
> Victor
>
> PS:
> could you please reply to
> v.volle _ at _ computer.org
> as well
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2) [message #596758 is a reply to message #64222] |
Mon, 11 December 2006 08:12 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Victor:
The JET2 syntax changes were made to support tag library support.
That said, I am working on integrating 100% compatibility with the JET1
syntax, and most importantly, compatibility with the generated Java classes.
Paul
"Victor Volle" <v.volle@computer.org> wrote in message
news:elh8nd$6ga$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> I am curious why the JET syntax changed from JET1 to JET2.
> I always liked the simplicity of the JET1 syntax and see no obvious reason
> to move to
> an XML-like syntax, moving away from a well known JSP-like template
> language.
>
> Bye
> Victor
>
> PS:
> could you please reply to
> v.volle _ at _ computer.org
> as well
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04133 seconds
Home