| [ATL] Compiling outside eclipse (part II) [message #63090] |
Thu, 27 September 2007 20:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: irbull.cs.uvic.ca
I have used ATL to compile outside eclipse successfully, by compiling a
transformation to an ASM file, and then using that file in my
transformation. I was wondering why files are used instead of byte
streams. I know it is possible to pass a byte stream into the ATL
compiler, but why can't I get a byte stream back out (the byte stream
would represent the successfully compiled ATL transformation). Then I
could pass this byte stream to the transformation?
Cheers,
Ian
|
|
|
|
| Re: [ATL] Compiling outside eclipse (part II) [message #63211 is a reply to message #63162] |
Sat, 29 September 2007 00:54  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: irbull.cs.uvic.ca
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=204974
I'll see if I can help with a patch :)
cheers,
ian
Frédéric Jouault wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> > I have used ATL to compile outside eclipse successfully, by compiling a
> > transformation to an ASM file, and then using that file in my
> > transformation. I was wondering why files are used instead of byte
> > streams. I know it is possible to pass a byte stream into the ATL
> > compiler, but why can't I get a byte stream back out (the byte stream
> > would represent the successfully compiled ATL transformation). Then I
> > could pass this byte stream to the transformation?
>
> You have a good point here.
>
> Why don't you open a bugzilla entry for this?
>
> Of course, it would be even better if you could also submit a patch ;-).
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Frédéric Jouault
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04199 seconds
Home