| 
| How to get involved? [message #456] | Tue, 07 December 2004 23:01  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Originally posted by: dmitriy.mochamail.com 
 I'd like to be involved in Birt project. Is it possible? What's procedure?
 I have architects, developers, and coders.
 |  |  |  | 
| 
| Re: How to get involved? [message #546 is a reply to message #456] | Thu, 16 December 2004 20:33  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | D R, 
 Thanks for your interest in BIRT. What areas of the BIRT technology are you
 interested in participating in? Are you actively working on BI technology
 today? Curious to know more about where your interest lies.
 
 Eclipse has a good process in place for people interested in contributing to
 a project. You can get details on this from the Eclipse Development Process
 document (see
 http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse%20Development%2 0Process%202003_11_09%20FINAL.pdf).
 As was mentioned in an earlier posting in this newsgroup: "The quick and
 short answer is that you earn the right to be contributor. On other
 projects, I seen this done via doing code patches, bug fixes and etc. On the
 WTP project, there are people that have a related open source project or
 plug-in and have donated it to the WTP project and became contributor this
 way. I would expect this project to follow this process."
 
 For BIRT, there is going to be opportunity to look at the code and
 contribute using this process over the coming months as we upload more code
 to the Eclipse CVS repository. In addition, a core goal for BIRT is to
 provide extension points for the technology -- which will provide additional
 opportunities. For example, adding new chart types to the charting
 capabilities.
 
 Regards,
 
 Paul Clenahan
 Actuate (www.actuatecom)
 BIRT PMC
 
 "D R" <dmitriy@mochamail.com> wrote in message
 news:cp5uak$tfa$1@www.eclipse.org...
 > I'd like to be involved in Birt project. Is it possible? What's procedure?
 > I have architects, developers, and coders.
 >
 |  |  |  | 
Powered by 
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03492 seconds