New Merge dialog? [message #38097] |
Tue, 18 November 2008 03:52  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi!
Since Eclipse 3.4 i have a problem with the merge dialog of subversive.
Before (eclipse 3.3, subversive 2.0.0, SVNKit 1.1.4), the merge dialog
showed the INCOMING changes from the merge (and also merge conflicts).
This was very nice!
Now (eclipse 3.4, subversive 2.0.5, Connector SVN 1.5.2/SVNKit 1.2.0), the
merge immediately changes the local files and presents outgoing changes in
the merge dialog. Conflicts are not shown in the diff view :-( Yet another
problem: new files in the trunc are remove (!!) when mergin is done...
(that never happens with the old dialog).
What has happened? Why is the very good old behaviour gone? Is is possible
to still use the old dialog? At the moment i am still eclipse 3.3 only to
merge my projetcs...
Best regards
Gernot
|
|
|
|
Re: New Merge dialog? [message #38570 is a reply to message #38199] |
Mon, 01 December 2008 04:55   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Could you elaborate a bit more?
Because the behavior described below is a bit scary: Subversive can
delete by itself some files on our local workspace?
It does not look very reasonable to do this without any confirmation by
the user, does it?
Regards,
Francois
Igor Burilo wrote:
> Hello Gernot,
>
> We have such a behaviour for merge in order to support svn's 1.5 merge
> tracking.
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Since Eclipse 3.4 i have a problem with the merge dialog of subversive.
>>
>> Before (eclipse 3.3, subversive 2.0.0, SVNKit 1.1.4), the merge dialog
>> showed the INCOMING changes from the merge (and also merge conflicts).
>> This was very nice!
>>
>> Now (eclipse 3.4, subversive 2.0.5, Connector SVN 1.5.2/SVNKit 1.2.0), the
>> merge immediately changes the local files and presents outgoing changes in
>> the merge dialog. Conflicts are not shown in the diff view :-( Yet another
>> problem: new files in the trunc are remove (!!) when mergin is done...
>> (that never happens with the old dialog).
>>
>> What has happened? Why is the very good old behaviour gone? Is is possible
>> to still use the old dialog? At the moment i am still eclipse 3.3 only to
>> merge my projetcs...
>>
>> Best regards
>> Gernot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Please reinstate old merge preview! Re: New Merge dialog? [message #48016 is a reply to message #38570] |
Wed, 01 July 2009 08:29  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: joerg.von.frantzius.artnology.com
Hi,
to whom it may concern, I filed
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282143 as an enhancement
request for reinstating the old merge preview functionality, which could
optionally be chosen by the user in favor of support for merge tracking.
It's really a pity that this useful feature had been dropped completely
in favor of merge tracking.
Regards,
Jörg
Francois Cottet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you elaborate a bit more?
> Because the behavior described below is a bit scary: Subversive can
> delete by itself some files on our local workspace?
> It does not look very reasonable to do this without any confirmation
> by the user, does it?
>
> Regards,
> Francois
>
>
>
> Igor Burilo wrote:
>> Hello Gernot,
>>
>> We have such a behaviour for merge in order to support svn's 1.5
>> merge tracking.
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Since Eclipse 3.4 i have a problem with the merge dialog of subversive.
>>>
>>> Before (eclipse 3.3, subversive 2.0.0, SVNKit 1.1.4), the merge
>>> dialog showed the INCOMING changes from the merge (and also merge
>>> conflicts). This was very nice!
>>>
>>> Now (eclipse 3.4, subversive 2.0.5, Connector SVN 1.5.2/SVNKit
>>> 1.2.0), the merge immediately changes the local files and presents
>>> outgoing changes in the merge dialog. Conflicts are not shown in the
>>> diff view :-( Yet another problem: new files in the trunc are remove
>>> (!!) when mergin is done... (that never happens with the old dialog).
>>>
>>> What has happened? Why is the very good old behaviour gone? Is is
>>> possible to still use the old dialog? At the moment i am still
>>> eclipse 3.3 only to merge my projetcs...
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Gernot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03436 seconds