Eclipse Community Forums: Eclipse Platform » org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes

Home » Eclipse Projects » Eclipse Platform » org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes

org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331643]

Mon, 15 September 2008 10:16

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: jarciuch.wp.pl

Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
and
org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
to define content type?

It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension should be
used?

Regards,
Jan

Re: org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331645 is a reply to message #331643]

Mon, 15 September 2008 10:19

Eclipse User

Jan,

Comments below.

Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
> Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
> org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
>
This one is deprecated in 2.5
> and
> org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
> to define content type?
>
And this one isn't.
> It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
>
That's exactly what they are.
> What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension should be
> used?
>
I'd use the one that isn't deprecated in 2.5. :-P
> Regards,
> Jan
>
>
>

Re: org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331646 is a reply to message #331645]

Mon, 15 September 2008 10:37

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: jarciuch.wp.pl

That's what I suspected. :) Just couldn't find 'depricated' or any relevant
info in the extension point docs (hence my confusion).
Cheers,
Jan

"Ed Merks" <Ed.Merks@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:galqt5$k6n$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Jan,
>
> Comments below.
>
> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>> Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
>>
> This one is deprecated in 2.5
>> and
>> org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
>> to define content type?
>>
> And this one isn't.
>> It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
>>
> That's exactly what they are.
>> What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension should be
>> used?
>>
> I'd use the one that isn't deprecated in 2.5. :-P
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>>
>>

Re: org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331650 is a reply to message #331646]

Mon, 15 September 2008 13:13

Eclipse User

Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
> That's what I suspected. :) Just couldn't find 'depricated' or any relevant
> info in the extension point docs (hence my confusion).
>
You don't see this because it got deprecated in 3.5 (not 2.5).

Dani
> Cheers,
> Jan
>
> "Ed Merks" <Ed.Merks@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:galqt5$k6n$1@build.eclipse.org...
>
>> Jan,
>>
>> Comments below.
>>
>> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>>
>>> Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
>>>
>>>
>> This one is deprecated in 2.5
>>
>>> and
>>> org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
>>> to define content type?
>>>
>>>
>> And this one isn't.
>>
>>> It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
>>>
>>>
>> That's exactly what they are.
>>
>>> What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension should be
>>> used?
>>>
>>>
>> I'd use the one that isn't deprecated in 2.5. :-P
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

Re: org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes vs. org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes [message #331652 is a reply to message #331650]

Mon, 15 September 2008 14:03

Eclipse User

Dani,

Sorry. It's EMF that's at 2.5, which of course is totally irrelevant
when answering platform newsgroup questions. :-P

Daniel Megert wrote:
> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>> That's what I suspected. :) Just couldn't find 'depricated' or any
>> relevant info in the extension point docs (hence my confusion).
>>
> You don't see this because it got deprecated in 3.5 (not 2.5).
>
> Dani
>> Cheers,
>> Jan
>>
>> "Ed Merks" <Ed.Merks@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:galqt5$k6n$1@build.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Jan,
>>>
>>> Comments below.
>>>
>>> Jan Arciuchiewicz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anybody know what is the difference between using:
>>>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.contentTypes
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This one is deprecated in 2.5
>>>
>>>> and
>>>> org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contenTypes
>>>> to define content type?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> And this one isn't.
>>>
>>>> It looks like there are 2 different extensions doing the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's exactly what they are.
>>>
>>>> What is the best practice to contribute content? What extension
>>>> should be used?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'd use the one that isn't deprecated in 2.5. :-P
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>

Previous Topic:	Problem of Classloader in Eclipse Plugin Developemt.
Next Topic:	ClassNotFoundException (org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite) when running the Testing Framework

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Fri Jul 25 08:30:42 EDT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter