| Decouple org.eclipse.compare from IDE [message #325325] |
Thu, 14 February 2008 12:20  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I saw this bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=207704
which mentions decoupling the compare functionality from the IDE to be
used in RCP application. The bug goes in a different direction
(decoupling the ui from the core), so I though I should post here first.
Is it feasible to make compare usable in RCP applications and is there
any interest? Are there better alternatives? Should I make a separate
enhancement request for this?
Sorry for posting on two newsgroups, but I was not sure which was
appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Decouple org.eclipse.compare from IDE [message #325434 is a reply to message #325410] |
Mon, 18 February 2008 12:50  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Daniel Megert wrote:
> Will Horn wrote:
>> Daniel Megert wrote:
>>> Will Horn wrote:
>>>> I saw this bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=207704
>>>> which mentions decoupling the compare functionality from the IDE to
>>>> be used in RCP application. The bug goes in a different direction
>>>> (decoupling the ui from the core), so I though I should post here
>>>> first.
>>> In 3.3 the application specific part got removed from the ide.ui
>>> plug-in and hence you can simply add it to your list of required
>>> plug-ins, unless of course size is really crucial for your RCP
>>> application.
>>>
>>> Dani
>> I don't understand - in 3.3 org.eclipse.ui.ide seems to contain quite
>> a bit of Eclipse IDE application specific code.
> What exactly are you referring to?
I was looking at the views (ResourceNavigator, etc) and the commands
(buildProject, selectWorkingSets, etc). I guess this is fairly generic
code, but it only makes sense in an "IDE".
The only immediately noticeable thing I get from adding
org.eclipse.ui.ide is some unwanted menu items ("File Open..." in the
file menu, "Software Updates..." on the Help menu, etc).
>
> Dani
>>>>
>>>> Is it feasible to make compare usable in RCP applications and is
>>>> there any interest? Are there better alternatives? Should I make a
>>>> separate enhancement request for this?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for posting on two newsgroups, but I was not sure which was
>>>> appropriate.
|
|
|
| Re: Decouple org.eclipse.compare from IDE [message #325449 is a reply to message #325434] |
Tue, 19 February 2008 03:26 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Will Horn wrote:
> Daniel Megert wrote:
>> Will Horn wrote:
>>> Daniel Megert wrote:
>>>> Will Horn wrote:
>>>>> I saw this bug
>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=207704 which
>>>>> mentions decoupling the compare functionality from the IDE to be
>>>>> used in RCP application. The bug goes in a different direction
>>>>> (decoupling the ui from the core), so I though I should post here
>>>>> first.
>>>> In 3.3 the application specific part got removed from the ide.ui
>>>> plug-in and hence you can simply add it to your list of required
>>>> plug-ins, unless of course size is really crucial for your RCP
>>>> application.
>>>>
>>>> Dani
>>> I don't understand - in 3.3 org.eclipse.ui.ide seems to contain
>>> quite a bit of Eclipse IDE application specific code.
>> What exactly are you referring to?
> I was looking at the views (ResourceNavigator, etc) and the commands
> (buildProject, selectWorkingSets, etc). I guess this is fairly
> generic code, but it only makes sense in an "IDE".
That's why I said "if you don't care about size". Some apps might indeed
want to use working sets and some might want to use core.resources and
hence all the core.resources related UI stuff.
>
> The only immediately noticeable thing I get from adding
> org.eclipse.ui.ide is some unwanted menu items ("File Open..." in the
> file menu, "Software Updates..." on the Help menu, etc).
Your RCP application can provide its own workbench advisor and hence
remove the unwanted menu(items)s easily.
Dani
>>
>> Dani
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it feasible to make compare usable in RCP applications and is
>>>>> there any interest? Are there better alternatives? Should I make
>>>>> a separate enhancement request for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for posting on two newsgroups, but I was not sure which was
>>>>> appropriate.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06916 seconds
Home