| Is there a timetable for JEM Proxy to become official API? [message #311212] |
Thu, 04 January 2007 16:47  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: liam.morley.baesystems.com
About 2 years ago, I started using JEM (Java EMF Model) Proxy, thanks to a
lot of assistance from Rich Kulp. At that time, I had to access classes that
were marked as internal within the jem.proxy jar. Are there any plans to
change the API for jem.proxy, or is it close to the point that it can become
official API?
Thanks,
Liam
|
|
|
|
| Re: Is there a timetable for JEM Proxy to become official API? [message #311246 is a reply to message #311245] |
Fri, 05 January 2007 17:20  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: john.eclipsefaq.org
That should have read eclipse.tools.emf.
--
John Arthorne wrote:
> JEM isn't part of the platform project, so you might have better luck
> another newsgroup - perhaps the eclipse.technology.emf group?
> --
>
> Liam Morley wrote:
>
>> About 2 years ago, I started using JEM (Java EMF Model) Proxy, thanks
>> to a lot of assistance from Rich Kulp. At that time, I had to access
>> classes that were marked as internal within the jem.proxy jar. Are
>> there any plans to change the API for jem.proxy, or is it close to the
>> point that it can become official API?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Liam
>>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03174 seconds
Home