Home » Archived » DSDP » Questions
|
| Re: Questions [message #248 is a reply to message #223] |
Tue, 17 May 2005 21:08   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mimrisek.testingthatthisremovesthis.com
Hello Bryce,
Bare metal embedded development definitely had representation at the debug
meetings - as it happens this is one of the areas that we are very
interested in.
I suppose you can breathe a little easier now. :^)
Can you tell the newsgroup a little more about your interest in embedded
debug and Eclipse? i.e. What are the most significant issues that you have
with embedded debugging and Eclipse that you are looking to be solved?
Are you currently using some kind of Eclipse based solution for the
devices you are targetting?
Cheers,
Martin
Bryce Schober wrote:
> I've been frustrated w/ Eclipse's poor embedded debugging support, so I
signed up for this newsgroup as soon
as I heard about it. I've got two questions about this project:
> 1. I'm probably being paranoid, but with the number of OS vendors partnering
for this project, I'm a little worried about bare metal target support, which
seems like it is one of my current barriers to using Eclipse for my embedded
development. I guess this isn't a question but a request for reassurance. ;-)
> 2. What kind of time frame should we be thinking about for something usable
to come out of this project? Late 2005? Early 2006? Later? I know it's _way_
too early for anything near a solid estimate, but I'm just looking for a gut
feeling on how soon requirements could be worked out and the basics could be
worked out.
> Thanks,
> - Bryce Schober
|
|
|
| Re: Questions [message #453 is a reply to message #248] |
Tue, 31 May 2005 17:18 |
 Doug Gaff
Messages: 150
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Bryce,
1. Adding to what Martin said, several of the companies participating in
the Device Debugging and Target Management subprojects are interested in
bare-metal connectivity. For example, Wind River and Accelerated
Technologies have both made many proprietary extensions to Eclipse to
support JTAG-based connectivity, and we are both interested in
standardization and extension of the debug platform in this area.
2. It is very early in the process to pick a release date, but at the
Device Debug meeting in Chicago, we discussed aligning our first release
with Eclipse 3.2 in Spring 2006. I'm sure we will release milestone
builds along the way, too. We are in the requirements gathering phase
right now for both Target Management and Device Debugging.
I'll echo what Martin said, please comment on your use cases and what
you're looking for from Eclipse and DSDP. :)
Thanks,
Doug
"Martin Imrisek" <mimrisek@testingthatthisremovesthis.com> wrote in
message news:mimrisek@testingthatthisremovesthis.com:
> Hello Bryce,
>
> Bare metal embedded development definitely had representation at the debug
> meetings - as it happens this is one of the areas that we are very
> interested in.
> I suppose you can breathe a little easier now. :^)
>
> Can you tell the newsgroup a little more about your interest in embedded
> debug and Eclipse? i.e. What are the most significant issues that you have
> with embedded debugging and Eclipse that you are looking to be solved?
> Are you currently using some kind of Eclipse based solution for the
> devices you are targetting?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin
>
> Bryce Schober wrote:
>
> > I've been frustrated w/ Eclipse's poor embedded debugging support, so I
> signed up for this newsgroup as soon
> as I heard about it. I've got two questions about this project:
>
> > 1. I'm probably being paranoid, but with the number of OS vendors partnering
> for this project, I'm a little worried about bare metal target support, which
> seems like it is one of my current barriers to using Eclipse for my embedded
> development. I guess this isn't a question but a request for reassurance. ;-)
>
> > 2. What kind of time frame should we be thinking about for something usable
> to come out of this project? Late 2005? Early 2006? Later? I know it's _way_
> too early for anything near a solid estimate, but I'm just looking for a gut
> feeling on how soon requirements could be worked out and the basics could be
> worked out.
>
> > Thanks,
> > - Bryce Schober
|
|
| |
| Re: Questions [message #566002 is a reply to message #248] |
Tue, 31 May 2005 17:18 |
Doug Gaff
Messages: 150
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Bryce,
1. Adding to what Martin said, several of the companies participating in
the Device Debugging and Target Management subprojects are interested in
bare-metal connectivity. For example, Wind River and Accelerated
Technologies have both made many proprietary extensions to Eclipse to
support JTAG-based connectivity, and we are both interested in
standardization and extension of the debug platform in this area.
2. It is very early in the process to pick a release date, but at the
Device Debug meeting in Chicago, we discussed aligning our first release
with Eclipse 3.2 in Spring 2006. I'm sure we will release milestone
builds along the way, too. We are in the requirements gathering phase
right now for both Target Management and Device Debugging.
I'll echo what Martin said, please comment on your use cases and what
you're looking for from Eclipse and DSDP. :)
Thanks,
Doug
"Martin Imrisek" <mimrisek@testingthatthisremovesthis.com> wrote in
message news:mimrisek@testingthatthisremovesthis.com:
> Hello Bryce,
>
> Bare metal embedded development definitely had representation at the debug
> meetings - as it happens this is one of the areas that we are very
> interested in.
> I suppose you can breathe a little easier now. :^)
>
> Can you tell the newsgroup a little more about your interest in embedded
> debug and Eclipse? i.e. What are the most significant issues that you have
> with embedded debugging and Eclipse that you are looking to be solved?
> Are you currently using some kind of Eclipse based solution for the
> devices you are targetting?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin
>
> Bryce Schober wrote:
>
> > I've been frustrated w/ Eclipse's poor embedded debugging support, so I
> signed up for this newsgroup as soon
> as I heard about it. I've got two questions about this project:
>
> > 1. I'm probably being paranoid, but with the number of OS vendors partnering
> for this project, I'm a little worried about bare metal target support, which
> seems like it is one of my current barriers to using Eclipse for my embedded
> development. I guess this isn't a question but a request for reassurance. ;-)
>
> > 2. What kind of time frame should we be thinking about for something usable
> to come out of this project? Late 2005? Early 2006? Later? I know it's _way_
> too early for anything near a solid estimate, but I'm just looking for a gut
> feeling on how soon requirements could be worked out and the basics could be
> worked out.
>
> > Thanks,
> > - Bryce Schober
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 18 11:19:00 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02891 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
