|
| Re: What is the minimal deployment of the webviewer? [message #253602 is a reply to message #253598] |
Mon, 27 August 2007 22:44   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: chrisbo.stcg.net
Hi Achim,
We were interested in this as well. This was the minimum set we came up
with (about 10 MB) in WEB-INF/lib:
axis-ant.jar
axis.jar
chartengineapi.jar
com.ibm.icu_3.4.4.1.jar
commons-cli-1.0.jar
commons-codec-1.3.jar
commons-discovery-0.2.jar
coreapi.jar
dataadapterapi.jar
dteapi.jar
engineapi.jar
flute.jar
jaxrpc.jar
js.jar
modelapi.jar
org.eclipse.emf.common_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
org.eclipse.emf.ecore.xmi_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
org.eclipse.emf.ecore_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
saaj.jar
sac.jar
scriptapi.jar
viewservlets.jar
wsdl4j-1.5.1.jar
We only needed simple HTML reports, so you will probably need more if
you want charts, PDF support, etc. Good luck!
Chris Bolton
Achim H. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried the WebViewerExample from Birt 2.2.0 and noticed that it
> size is nearly 40MB!
>
> Is it possible to strip it down to may be 10 or 20 MB at maximum?
> Which libraries and plugins are really needed?
> Why are some libraries in both WEB-INF/lib and platform\plugins?
> - com.ibm.icu_3.6.1.v20070417.jar
> - org.eclipse.emf.*
> - modelapi.jar vs. org.eclipse.birt.report.model_2.2.0.v20070619.jar
> - chartengineapi.jar etc.
>
> Thanks
> Achim
|
|
|
| Re: What is the minimal deployment of the webviewer? [message #253605 is a reply to message #253602] |
Tue, 28 August 2007 00:18 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vencat.b.gmail.com
I myself raised this question couple of times before and i know others have
but can someone from BIRT-DEV answer this please? The memory footprint is
too high otherwise.
If you want PDF i know for sure you need batik, batik-svg, itext under
platform
"Chris Bolton" <chrisbo@stcg.net> wrote in message
news:favk53$i1a$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi Achim,
>
> We were interested in this as well. This was the minimum set we came up
> with (about 10 MB) in WEB-INF/lib:
>
> axis-ant.jar
> axis.jar
> chartengineapi.jar
> com.ibm.icu_3.4.4.1.jar
> commons-cli-1.0.jar
> commons-codec-1.3.jar
> commons-discovery-0.2.jar
> coreapi.jar
> dataadapterapi.jar
> dteapi.jar
> engineapi.jar
> flute.jar
> jaxrpc.jar
> js.jar
> modelapi.jar
> org.eclipse.emf.common_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
> org.eclipse.emf.ecore.xmi_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
> org.eclipse.emf.ecore_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
> saaj.jar
> sac.jar
> scriptapi.jar
> viewservlets.jar
> wsdl4j-1.5.1.jar
>
> We only needed simple HTML reports, so you will probably need more if you
> want charts, PDF support, etc. Good luck!
>
> Chris Bolton
>
> Achim H. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just tried the WebViewerExample from Birt 2.2.0 and noticed that it
>> size is nearly 40MB!
>>
>> Is it possible to strip it down to may be 10 or 20 MB at maximum?
>> Which libraries and plugins are really needed?
>> Why are some libraries in both WEB-INF/lib and platform\plugins?
>> - com.ibm.icu_3.6.1.v20070417.jar
>> - org.eclipse.emf.*
>> - modelapi.jar vs. org.eclipse.birt.report.model_2.2.0.v20070619.jar
>> - chartengineapi.jar etc.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Achim
|
|
|
|
| Re: What is the minimal deployment of the webviewer? [message #253762 is a reply to message #253725] |
Tue, 28 August 2007 23:40 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: chrisbo.stcg.net
Hi Achim,
Sorry, looks like I pulled this listing from a standard install. We
decided a while back that in our case we weren't saving enough to
deviate from a standard BIRT install, so the minimized version I had may
have disappeared for good. I believe we got the plugins library down to
around 13 jars or so, but I don't know what happened to that install.
I'll look around some more for it, and should I find it again before
anyone else can post the minimal set, I'll post what we had. Sorry for
my mistake.
Achim H. wrote:
> What about the platform folder?
> Did you remove any libraries/plugins from it?
>
> Achim
>
> Chris Bolton schrieb:
>> Hi Achim,
>>
>> We were interested in this as well. This was the minimum set we came
>> up with (about 10 MB) in WEB-INF/lib:
>>
>> axis-ant.jar
>> axis.jar
>> chartengineapi.jar
>> com.ibm.icu_3.4.4.1.jar
>> commons-cli-1.0.jar
>> commons-codec-1.3.jar
>> commons-discovery-0.2.jar
>> coreapi.jar
>> dataadapterapi.jar
>> dteapi.jar
>> engineapi.jar
>> flute.jar
>> jaxrpc.jar
>> js.jar
>> modelapi.jar
>> org.eclipse.emf.common_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
>> org.eclipse.emf.ecore.xmi_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
>> org.eclipse.emf.ecore_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
>> saaj.jar
>> sac.jar
>> scriptapi.jar
>> viewservlets.jar
>> wsdl4j-1.5.1.jar
>>
>> We only needed simple HTML reports, so you will probably need more if
>> you want charts, PDF support, etc. Good luck!
>>
>> Chris Bolton
>>
>> Achim H. wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just tried the WebViewerExample from Birt 2.2.0 and noticed that it
>>> size is nearly 40MB!
>>>
>>> Is it possible to strip it down to may be 10 or 20 MB at maximum?
>>> Which libraries and plugins are really needed?
>>> Why are some libraries in both WEB-INF/lib and platform\plugins?
>>> - com.ibm.icu_3.6.1.v20070417.jar
>>> - org.eclipse.emf.*
>>> - modelapi.jar vs. org.eclipse.birt.report.model_2.2.0.v20070619.jar
>>> - chartengineapi.jar etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Achim
|
|
|
| Re: What is the minimal deployment of the webviewer? [message #253769 is a reply to message #253762] |
Wed, 29 August 2007 00:34 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vencat.b.gmail.com
I tried with what chris posted before but did not work for me. All the OSGI
related jar files were also needed in plug-ins directory. So unless we know
the purpose of each jar file it might be hard to minimize this. Can someone
from BIRT development team respond please?
"Chris Bolton" <chrisbo@stcg.net> wrote in message
news:fb2bpq$h2v$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi Achim,
>
> Sorry, looks like I pulled this listing from a standard install. We
> decided a while back that in our case we weren't saving enough to deviate
> from a standard BIRT install, so the minimized version I had may have
> disappeared for good. I believe we got the plugins library down to around
> 13 jars or so, but I don't know what happened to that install. I'll look
> around some more for it, and should I find it again before anyone else can
> post the minimal set, I'll post what we had. Sorry for my mistake.
>
>
> Achim H. wrote:
>> What about the platform folder?
>> Did you remove any libraries/plugins from it?
>>
>> Achim
>>
>> Chris Bolton schrieb:
>>> Hi Achim,
>>>
>>> We were interested in this as well. This was the minimum set we came up
>>> with (about 10 MB) in WEB-INF/lib:
>>>
>>> axis-ant.jar
>>> axis.jar
>>> chartengineapi.jar
>>> com.ibm.icu_3.4.4.1.jar
>>> commons-cli-1.0.jar
>>> commons-codec-1.3.jar
>>> commons-discovery-0.2.jar
>>> coreapi.jar
>>> dataadapterapi.jar
>>> dteapi.jar
>>> engineapi.jar
>>> flute.jar
>>> jaxrpc.jar
>>> js.jar
>>> modelapi.jar
>>> org.eclipse.emf.common_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
>>> org.eclipse.emf.ecore.xmi_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
>>> org.eclipse.emf.ecore_2.2.0.v200606051102.jar
>>> saaj.jar
>>> sac.jar
>>> scriptapi.jar
>>> viewservlets.jar
>>> wsdl4j-1.5.1.jar
>>>
>>> We only needed simple HTML reports, so you will probably need more if
>>> you want charts, PDF support, etc. Good luck!
>>>
>>> Chris Bolton
>>>
>>> Achim H. wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I just tried the WebViewerExample from Birt 2.2.0 and noticed that it
>>>> size is nearly 40MB!
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to strip it down to may be 10 or 20 MB at maximum?
>>>> Which libraries and plugins are really needed?
>>>> Why are some libraries in both WEB-INF/lib and platform\plugins?
>>>> - com.ibm.icu_3.6.1.v20070417.jar
>>>> - org.eclipse.emf.*
>>>> - modelapi.jar vs. org.eclipse.birt.report.model_2.2.0.v20070619.jar
>>>> - chartengineapi.jar etc.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Achim
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03058 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
