[Zest] Zest Layouts [message #247218] |
Wed, 11 February 2009 11:47 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Ian,
i have to display some dependencies with the help of
zest and the jgrapht library, i use the DirectedGraph
class from this library as an input to the GraphViewer
from zest.
At the moment i have a problem with layouts.
Just like in the org.eclipse.pde.visualization.dependency
example i use the CompositeLayoutAlgorithm which is
composed of the DirectedGraphLayoutAlgorithm and HorizontalShift.
Only HorizontalShift seems to be applied.
Could you please review the snippet on this location, its a
little example of my situation(you can import it as a project
and open the view with an action in the main tool bar) :
http://depositfiles.com/files/uax112e5c
What could be the reason for such a behaviour ?
What am i doing wrong ?
thank you for help
|
|
|
Re: [Zest] Zest Layouts [message #247284 is a reply to message #247218] |
Fri, 13 February 2009 16:46 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: irbull.cs.uvic.ca
Yes, the one in Zest removes the horizontal placement. this is a bug
(We actually do this on purpose because the horizontal placement is
slow, I then manually place it myself).
Can you open a bug
cheers,
ian
Aleksey wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> i have to display some dependencies with the help of
> zest and the jgrapht library, i use the DirectedGraph
> class from this library as an input to the GraphViewer from zest.
>
> At the moment i have a problem with layouts.
>
> Just like in the org.eclipse.pde.visualization.dependency
> example i use the CompositeLayoutAlgorithm which is
> composed of the DirectedGraphLayoutAlgorithm and HorizontalShift.
> Only HorizontalShift seems to be applied.
>
> Could you please review the snippet on this location, its a little
> example of my situation(you can import it as a project
> and open the view with an action in the main tool bar) :
> http://depositfiles.com/files/uax112e5c
>
> What could be the reason for such a behaviour ?
> What am i doing wrong ?
>
> thank you for help
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03160 seconds