|
Re: WS-I validator dependent on plugin runtime? [message #227532 is a reply to message #227530] |
Wed, 04 February 2009 03:57 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dcarver.starstandard.org
There is an open bug that has some instructions how to patch it to get
it to run outside of eclipse:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=179722
The problem is that they weren't careful when re-doing their
implementation, and didn't think of the need to have it continue to run
outside of eclipse.
The above bug with the patches can get it to work though.
Dave
Jeff F wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm attempting to use the WS-I extension to the WSDL validator
> programatically (outside of eclipse) and I'm stuck on this error:
>
> A problem occurred while running the Extension validator
> org.eclipse.wst.wsi.internal.validate.wsdl.WSDLValidator for namespace
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/.
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/eclipse/core/runtime/Plugin
>
> I had some other dependency issues that I was able to fix, but I'm wondering
> about this one. It seems like this library shouldn't be required if I'm
> using outside of eclipse. And this article (which appears to be somewhat
> recent) provides instructions on how to do this and doesn't mention anything
> about needing such a library:
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Using_the_WSDL_Validator_O utside_of_Eclipse
>
> So, I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong. I'm using the libraries
> from the 3.1 M4 release. Has anyone succeeded in doing this?
>
> -Jeff
>
>
|
|
|
|
Re: WS-I validator dependent on plugin runtime? [message #227539 is a reply to message #227536] |
Wed, 04 February 2009 19:48 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dcarver.starstandard.org
Jeff F wrote:
> Thanks Dave.
>
> So, if I understand correctly, I need to perform the steps in comment #6
> which includes applying the patch, adding a bunch of libraries, hand editing
> several files and ultimately calling the validator differently than the
> simpler approach described in the article in my first post?
>
> That's a lot of work to get this thing working. Do you or anyone know the
> status of getting this thing into the code base? That last comment seems to
> suggest that WTP 3.1 may see the update.
Not sure what the status is. You might want to leave a message in the
bug so that they know there is still interest in it.
Also, that bug is one way to do it, there may be other methods, but
they'll still need some rework. The problem with using it outside of
eclipse, is the fact that they have some code that is dependent on IFile
resources and eclipse api. The patches that I had submitted let it
work both in eclipse and outside, but it's been a while since I last
visited the code, so things might have changed.
Dave
|
|
|
Re: WS-I validator dependent on plugin runtime? [message #227543 is a reply to message #227539] |
Wed, 04 February 2009 20:52 |
Jeff Faath Messages: 3 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Good idea, it would be much nicer if the WS-I validator could be run as
easily as the article stated. Thanks for your comments.
"David Carver" <dcarver@starstandard.org> wrote in message
news:4989F10D.2010809@starstandard.org...
> Jeff F wrote:
>> Thanks Dave.
>>
>> So, if I understand correctly, I need to perform the steps in comment #6
>> which includes applying the patch, adding a bunch of libraries, hand
>> editing several files and ultimately calling the validator differently
>> than the simpler approach described in the article in my first post?
>>
>> That's a lot of work to get this thing working. Do you or anyone know
>> the status of getting this thing into the code base? That last comment
>> seems to suggest that WTP 3.1 may see the update.
>
> Not sure what the status is. You might want to leave a message in the
> bug so that they know there is still interest in it.
>
> Also, that bug is one way to do it, there may be other methods, but
> they'll still need some rework. The problem with using it outside of
> eclipse, is the fact that they have some code that is dependent on IFile
> resources and eclipse api. The patches that I had submitted let it work
> both in eclipse and outside, but it's been a while since I last visited
> the code, so things might have changed.
>
> Dave
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03289 seconds