|
|
Re: Any plans to allow developers to plugin the transport? [message #1319001 is a reply to message #1315374] |
Mon, 28 April 2014 01:01 |
Sanjay Saxena Messages: 2 Registered: April 2014 |
Junior Member |
|
|
A pluggable transport would be useful for all clients -- C/C+, Java, C#, etc.
I think that opening up additional ports in the firewall, as needed by running MQTT directly over TCP, would not sit well with enterprises who are very conservative about it. WebSocket protocol uses port 80 for regular WebSocket connections and port 443 for WebSocket connections tunneled over TLS. Since ports 80 and 443 are already open in a corporate firewall to handle HTTP and HTTP traffic, there is no need for any additional ports to be opened if MQTT is running over WebSocket. So, running MQTT over WebSocket would not run into any resistance from the corporate IT folks and this translates into wider MQTT acceptance.
[Updated on: Mon, 28 April 2014 01:04] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03170 seconds