Gemini Blueprint Milestone shipped with OSGi R4.2? [message #1255807] |
Mon, 24 February 2014 21:03 |
Martin Baumgartner Messages: 9 Registered: June 2013 |
Junior Member |
|
|
According to this message http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/mv/msg/642416/1237771/#msg_1237771 Gemini Blueprint 2 should be shipped with OSGi R4.3 level.
I downloaded the actual Snapshot and tried to use it in one of my projects, but couldn't without adaption. The problem is, that actual Gemini Blueprint 2 snapshots are shipped with org.osgi.core:4.2.0.
Gemini Blueprint 1.x is shipped org.osgi.core 3.7.2, gb-2 is shipped with version 4.2.0 but should be shipped with 4.3, right?
By taking a look at the sources on grepcode, i wonder why the API of 4.2 is reduced compared 4.3 and 3.7.2
4.3.1: grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.osgi/org.osgi.core/4.3.1/org/osgi/framework/BundleContext.java#BundleContext
4.2.0: grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.osgi/org.osgi.core/4.2.0/org/osgi/framework/BundleContext.java#BundleContext
3.7.2: grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/eclipse.org/3.7.2/org.eclipse/osgi/3.7.2/org/osgi/framework/BundleContext.java#BundleContext
Sorry for the bad links, your forum system says i have to write 5 posts to post external links.
BR
Martin
[Updated on: Mon, 24 February 2014 21:04] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Gemini Blueprint Milestone shipped with OSGi R4.2? [message #1265796 is a reply to message #1265027] |
Thu, 06 March 2014 15:19 |
Martin Baumgartner Messages: 9 Registered: June 2013 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Dmitry Sklyut wrote on Wed, 05 March 2014 12:50
Junit 4 - not sure if this will be a good time investment. At the time when initial implementation was created - it was something that filled a void. I am actually considering deprecating it and moving to something like paxexam (https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/PAXEXAM3/Pax+Exam).
Hello Dmitry,
you are right, its a void requirement.
I have taken a look to pax exam a few weeks ago and tried to understand how to combine it with gemini blueprint and failed. So I tried GB-Test for the first time and it seems great to me - ok documenation could be better. But by reading a bit of the code i understood it faster than i did with pax exam. And well, i think that is the main requirement of a test framework, right?
Are there issues with gb-test to set it to deprecated? If so, I couldn't find them in bugzilla.
BR,
Martin
[Updated on: Thu, 06 March 2014 15:24] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04180 seconds