Home » General (non-technical) » Eclipse Foundation » Groups working on Dynamic Languages?
| Groups working on Dynamic Languages? [message #19189] |
Sat, 23 April 2005 17:26  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mylastnameruntogether.mycompanyname.com
Are there any groups within the Eclipse foundation working on the needs
of Dynamic Languages? Exemplars would be things such as Lisp, Scheme,
OCaml, or Haskell. I've asked the LDT guys but they're not responding,
which leads me to believe it's a nice idea that someone mentioned but
that nobody's actually doing anything. I am aware of various
individuals who have devised plugins for various Dynamic Languages, with
various levels of completeness. But what I'm really asking about is
*Eclipse group* efforts, on basic infrastructure.
--
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
When no one else sells courage, supply and demand take hold.
|
|
|
| Re: Groups working on Dynamic Languages? [message #19192 is a reply to message #19189] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 00:22  |
 Mike Milinkovich
Messages: 260
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
The best possible answer I can say right now is: stay tuned. There is
definitely lots of conversations going on about getting something like this
off the ground. Are you interested in contributing?
"Brandon J. Van Every" <mylastnameruntogether@mycompanyname.com> wrote in
message news:d4e0ha$2tk$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Are there any groups within the Eclipse foundation working on the needs of
> Dynamic Languages? Exemplars would be things such as Lisp, Scheme, OCaml,
> or Haskell. I've asked the LDT guys but they're not responding, which
> leads me to believe it's a nice idea that someone mentioned but that
> nobody's actually doing anything. I am aware of various individuals who
> have devised plugins for various Dynamic Languages, with various levels of
> completeness. But what I'm really asking about is *Eclipse group*
> efforts, on basic infrastructure.
>
> --
> Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
> Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
>
> When no one else sells courage, supply and demand take hold.
|
|
|
| Re: Groups working on Dynamic Languages? [message #19198 is a reply to message #19192] |
Sun, 24 April 2005 04:26 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mylastnameruntogether.mycompanyname.com
Mike Milinkovich wrote:
>The best possible answer I can say right now is: stay tuned. There is
>definitely lots of conversations going on about getting something like this
>off the ground. Are you interested in contributing?
>
>
>
I don't have the Java or Eclipse expertise to contribute at this time.
However, I would like to keep tabs on developments, especially to give
feedback on what a non-Java HLL programmer is looking for. Right now my
plan is to try out DrSchme because it has its own self-contained IDE.
This I think will simply be easier in the short term, as from comments
like "stay tuned" I believe that Eclipse development on Dynamic
Languages is not quite where I'd like it to be yet. From having read
all the LDT backposts, I see many personalities and approaches in play,
so I'd like to see some resolution, structure, and observable roadmaps /
timetables / plans before trying to slot myself into anything.
If I went the Eclipse route to Scheme, it would be using the Schemeway
plugin. http://schemeway.sourceforge.net/ This is the work of 1 very
productive / overworked author. It is not a much documented tool, and
it has the "author can get killed by a bus" problem. The author is big
into Kawa Scheme, which does Java compliation IIUC. I've been more
interested in Bigloo Scheme, which has C, Java, and C# backends.
Also there's a fundamental issue of build culture to resolve. A Scheme
programmer is loathe to depend directly upon Java to do builds, i.e.
Ant. I also find 'make' distasteful; Scheme is a better language, why
not base build tools on that? So possibilities I see: use the 'make'
with Scheme syntax found in DrScheme (IIUC), use Scheme to interface to
Ant XML files, or use GNU Conjure http://home.gna.org/conjure/ . I
don't have an opinion yet on which way is the least painful to go. I
only know that as long as I'm doing Scheme, I won't put up with 'make'.
--
Cheers, www.indiegamedesign.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
"The pioneer is the one with the arrows in his back."
- anonymous entrepreneur
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Apr 16 18:02:08 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 1.60874 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
