Home » Eclipse Projects » NatTable » next release
| | |
| Re: next release [message #1229924 is a reply to message #1229803] |
Fri, 10 January 2014 14:58   |
 Dirk Fauth
Messages: 2902
Registered: July 2012 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi,
to be more precise, ATM I am the only ACTIVE committer in the project. Hopefully that changes soon again.
As we are tracking every task in Bugzilla you can find the tasks I want to take care of via this Bugzilla search:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?list_id=7907332&classification=Technology&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&emailassigned_to1=1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=dirk.fauth&product=NatTable
Some of them are almost done, I just need verification that it is really done. So that would be helpful too.
When does the performance issues in groupby appear? As this is currently something I was working on with the help of others, it might be something to consider also for the upcoming release.
Regarding JavaFX support, that is considered for the new architecture. First we need to finish 1.1 to have a stable version we don't need to take care of much anymore. We have some plans, designs and so on, but we are not far enough. Without much support, there is no progress of course.
So to answer your questions in short:
I hope to release NatTable 1.1 in the next weeks.
Plans for NatTable 2.x can be done when 1.1 is released.
Greez,
Dirk
|
|
| |
| Re: next release [message #1230042 is a reply to message #1229940] |
Fri, 10 January 2014 21:21 |
Paweł Doleciński
Messages: 44
Registered: January 2014 |
Member |
|
|
Thanks for the comprehensive answer, Dirk. This is exactly what I expected.
I've done a quick glance on the issues list and have to say I am interested in most of them to be completed more or less asap.
So if you don't mind, I would like to somehow be involved, at least by verification.
About the new architecture, so far that info is enough for me to make decisions. This is because, in a not so far future, we are interested in switching renderers in our e4 based app.
What do you mean by huge data sets? I see problems when having even 10k rows. It is not much I guess.
Everything is fine when using GroupBy demo. Problems come up when GroupBy is added to the "Everything" demo (not saying about blinking and group by together).
Maybe I did a wrong configuration, do not know.
Would you mind if I created an issue on bugzilla with further discussion and investigation?
If the problem lays in update (and my observation somehow confirms yours), then a better solution or at least working workaround seems to be extremely important to me.
Anyway, I have to really thank you for your and the others job!
Cheers,
Paweł.
|
|
|
| Re: next release [message #1230842 is a reply to message #1230042] |
Mon, 13 January 2014 07:56 |
Dirk Fauth
Messages: 2902
Registered: July 2012 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Quote:So if you don't mind, I would like to somehow be involved, at least by verification.
Why should I? Your welcome to support in any way you like! 
Using this link you will find all tickets that have been resolved since 1.0.1.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?list_id=7918183&classification=Technology&query_format=advanced&bug_status=RESOLVED&product=NatTable&target_milestone=1.1.0
It should be possible to test and verify them using the latest SNAPSHOT. Note that the examples that are accesible via our website has not been updated since then. So they are no help on verification.
And if you have some code to contribute, that is welcome too. We have enabled Gerrit for NatTable to make it easier to contribute.
Quote:What do you mean by huge data sets? I see problems when having even 10k rows. It is not much I guess.
Yes I can see it too with 10k rows. Of course for NatTable this shouldn't be much. But with the current implementation the whole 10k rows will be iterated, and added again to the list to solve the update issue.
Quote:Would you mind if I created an issue on bugzilla with further discussion and investigation?
Nope, if it is an issue for you, create a ticket.
Quote:in a not so far future, we are interested in switching renderers in our e4 based app
If NatTable is a core component of your application, I have to tell you that using the 1.x architecture it won't be possible. There are hard dependencies to SWT. With the new architecture we are removing those hard dependencies, making it more flexible, but you will need to modify your code then. But it is yet to soon to talk about details.
If you are interested I can ping you when we start working on the new architecture again, so you are able to get involved. Any help and support is appreciated by the whole team!
|
|
| |
| Re: next release [message #1231716 is a reply to message #1231316] |
Wed, 15 January 2014 08:43 |
Paweł Doleciński
Messages: 44
Registered: January 2014 |
Member |
|
|
Quote:Why should I? Your welcome to support in any way you like! Smile
Using this link you will find all tickets that have been resolved since 1.0.1.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?list_id=7918183&classification=Technology&query_format=advanced&bug_status=RESOLVED&product=NatTable&target_milestone=1.1.0
It should be possible to test and verify them using the latest SNAPSHOT. Note that the examples that are accesible via our website has not been updated since then. So they are no help on verification.
And if you have some code to contribute, that is welcome too. We have enabled Gerrit for NatTable to make it easier to contribute.
OK then, thank you. I am going to switch my project today to the latest snapshot.
Quote:If NatTable is a core component of your application, I have to tell you that using the 1.x architecture it won't be possible. There are hard dependencies to SWT. With the new architecture we are removing those hard dependencies, making it more flexible, but you will need to modify your code then. But it is yet to soon to talk about details.
If you are interested I can ping you when we start working on the new architecture again, so you are able to get involved. Any help and support is appreciated by the whole team!
Do not worry, for us it too soon as well. Simply wanted to know if this topic is still valid. And of course I am very interested and would be perfect for me to be involved.
Quote:For the performance on grouping have a look here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=425641
The only possible way to increase performance was to change the iteration and reapplying of list entries to a clear()-addAll(). The performance gets slightly better, but IMHO it will never be running as the tree structure gets calculated dynamically on grouping.
I've already seen the bug, tested it on examples and I am going to check this in my project today.
I see your point and I guess there is no other way to do it, for instance do not use glazed lists at this point?
I hope, for the time being, this will enough for us. Thanks!
Cheers,
Paweł.
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 20:41:02 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04229 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
