Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » Papyrus » Why the little plus signs?
Why the little plus signs? [message #1165667] Fri, 01 November 2013 12:56 Go to next message
Tomas Sandkvist is currently offline Tomas SandkvistFriend
Messages: 149
Registered: October 2013
Senior Member
I can't figure out why there are these little plus signs. When I add a new port, a smal text box is displayed that looks like those auto type boxes that is shown in Visual studio from which I can choose something already created.

These plusses seems to appear if I change the port name in that box. But why, and how do I shut it off? And what do they mean?

This I did not have while using 32-bit Eclipse, there must be some setting I have missed.

Regards,
Tomas Sandkvist

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why the little plus signs? [message #1170155 is a reply to message #1165667] Mon, 04 November 2013 12:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Camille Letavernier is currently offline Camille LetavernierFriend
Messages: 952
Registered: February 2011
Senior Member
Hi Tomas,


The "+" (Or -, ~, #) are the visibility marker. "+" means "Public".

No icon means "Undefined visibility". But it is not clear in the UML Specification what this means exactly. So, for "Public" elements, you can have either no overlay (The visibility has never been set), or the green "+" overlay (The visibility has explicitly been set to public)


Regards,
Camille

Camille Letavernier

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why the little plus signs? [message #1170266 is a reply to message #1170155] Mon, 04 November 2013 14:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tomas Sandkvist is currently offline Tomas SandkvistFriend
Messages: 149
Registered: October 2013
Senior Member
Aha, now I see!

The difference from my previous experience is simply that displaying the visibility is part of the CSS style, and that notation is not available/shown when there are no stylesheet used!

Regards,
Tomas

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why the little plus signs? [message #1851575 is a reply to message #1170266] Fri, 08 April 2022 18:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George Ericson is currently offline George EricsonFriend
Messages: 5
Registered: March 2022
Junior Member
Hmmm.... For the same class, some public properties show a green + and not for others. Is this on purpose?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why the little plus signs? [message #1851588 is a reply to message #1851575] Sat, 09 April 2022 11:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Carsten Pitz is currently offline Carsten PitzFriend
Messages: 479
Registered: May 2015
Location: Germany
Senior Member
The problem is within the UML specification. As there is no "undefined" visibility and "public" visibility is the default Papyrus distinguishes between"public" due to not explicitly set and explicitly set to "public". Explicitly setting to "public" often happens simply by clicking next the field in the "Properties" view.
/Carsten

Report message to a moderator

Re: Why the little plus signs? [message #1851741 is a reply to message #1851588] Thu, 14 April 2022 12:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Vincent Lorenzo is currently offline Vincent LorenzoFriend
Messages: 249
Registered: June 2010
Location: Paris Saclay, France
Senior Member
Hello everybody,
the green + appears after the first edition of the visibility of the property (if we set is to Public).
The default value of the visibility is Public, but as the property has not been explicitly set by the user the green + doesn't appears.

/Vincent


Report message to a moderator

Re: Why the little plus signs? [message #1852096 is a reply to message #1851741] Thu, 28 April 2022 22:56 Go to previous message
George Ericson is currently offline George EricsonFriend
Messages: 5
Registered: March 2022
Junior Member
Hmmm.... Yes, but...
I have two properties in the same class, same everything except name.
On one, the visibility setting public has no +.
On the other, the visibility setting public has a plus.
There is no option in the UI to not set the visibility property.
I went to the .uml file and found that @vincent is correct.
But you have to dig into the Xmi syntax to see that.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:Initial diagram form .uml file
Next Topic:Restrictions for Simple data type
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 25 12:21:27 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02893 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly