| WST depends on Visual Editor??? [message #170725] |
Tue, 06 June 2006 15:22  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dserodio.gmail.com
I'm trying the latest Callisto RC, and I noticed that WST depends on
Visual Editor? It doesn't make much sense to me... Is this dependency
intencional?
Thanks,
Daniel Serodio
|
|
|
| Re: WST depends on Visual Editor??? [message #170830 is a reply to message #170725] |
Thu, 08 June 2006 14:24  |
 David Williams
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:22:31 -0400, Daniel Serodio <dserodio@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm trying the latest Callisto RC, and I noticed that WST depends on
> Visual Editor? It doesn't make much sense to me... Is this dependency
> intencional?
>
This is some "quirk" of update manager. What we actually depend on
is the JEM (Java EMF Model) and it so happens that the Visual Editor
also "includes" it. This bug was a side effect, I believe, where update
manager was "missing" some dependancies, so was, somehow, made to look
a little harder for them, and unfortunately stops at "first one found",
instead of looking for "smallest set".
I _think_ there's a bug on update manager already, but, if you have
the time to check, (and enter one if not) that would be great.
|
|
|
| Re: WST depends on Visual Editor??? [message #170937 is a reply to message #170830] |
Fri, 09 June 2006 13:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dserodio.gmail.com
David Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:22:31 -0400, Daniel Serodio <dserodio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying the latest Callisto RC, and I noticed that WST depends on
>> Visual Editor? It doesn't make much sense to me... Is this dependency
>> intencional?
>
> This is some "quirk" of update manager. What we actually depend on
> is the JEM (Java EMF Model) and it so happens that the Visual Editor
> also "includes" it. This bug was a side effect, I believe, where update
> manager was "missing" some dependancies, so was, somehow, made to look
> a little harder for them, and unfortunately stops at "first one found",
> instead of looking for "smallest set".
>
> I _think_ there's a bug on update manager already, but, if you have
> the time to check, (and enter one if not) that would be great.
I didn't find any, so I submitted bug 146253.
Thanks,
Daniel Serodio
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02027 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
