|
|
| Re: [Teneo] Example download [message #1092216 is a reply to message #1091696] |
Thu, 22 August 2013 13:30   |
 John D
Messages: 6
Registered: August 2013 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Thanks a lot Martin for the info.
I did try out Texo before, but I faced a couple of issues with it like below
1. Maintain a separate set of model elements which do not follow the same hierarchy as my original model. eg: If I have a case like interface C extends A,B {}
2. I do not need a JSON serialization of the data as I have a standalone RCP applicaiton.
So far from what I have tried with Teneo(thanks to the pointer to the teneo/hibernate tutorials  ) it looks pretty good to me. So we are positive about adopting Teneo in our project now. However, we are still trying out more tests to check other characteristics like performance, scalability, searching, complex analysis on DB data etc.
Please suggest if there is any other major points (limitations ?)of Teneo which I should take into account before deciding.
Thanks,
John D
|
|
|
| Re: [Teneo] Example download [message #1092387 is a reply to message #1092216] |
Thu, 22 August 2013 18:27 |
Martin Taal
Messages: 5468
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi John,
Yes your first remark is completely correct, this has been an explicit Texo design choice for now.
I can't think of limitations for Teneo...
gr. Martin
On 08/22/2013 03:30 PM, John D wrote:
> Thanks a lot Martin for the info.
>
> I did try out Texo before, but I faced a couple of issues with it like below
>
> 1. Maintain a separate set of model elements which do not follow the same hierarchy as my original model. eg: If I have
> a case like interface C extends A,B {} in EMF,but Texo generated class C extends A but all the properties of B were
> copied to C. So when I read from the database, I cannot cast C to B.
>
> 2. I do not need a JSON serialization of the data as I have a standalone RCP applicaiton.
>
> So far from what I have tried with Teneo(thanks to the pointer to the teneo/hibernate tutorials :)) it looks pretty good
> to me. So we are positive about adopting Teneo in our project now. However, we are still trying out more tests to check
> other characteristics like performance, scalability, searching, complex analysis on DB data etc.
> Please suggest if there is any other major points (limitations ?)of Teneo which I should take into account before deciding.
> Thanks,
> John D
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@xxxxxxxx - mtaal@xxxxxxxx
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01895 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
