|
|
Re: Consitency Check [message #1063654 is a reply to message #1063647] |
Thu, 13 June 2013 15:22 |
Dirk Hoffmann Messages: 163 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Ed,
its just that I am a bit concerned about breaking the EPackage's
consistency through source code merge operations.
Regards,
Dirk
Am 13.06.2013 17:12, schrieb Ed Merks:
> Dirk,
>
> No, there isn't such a tool. I'm not sure how it could be inconsistent,
> unless you hand modified the generated package initialization code (or
> the serialized version being loaded) to make it inconsistent...
>
>
> On 13/06/2013 3:02 PM, Dirk Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> does anybody know of a tool that consistency checks the generated
>> EPackageImpl's, e.g. checks that all the EStructuralFeature getters
>> actually return the feature they promise?
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Dirk
>
|
|
|
Re: Consitency Check [message #1063676 is a reply to message #1063654] |
Thu, 13 June 2013 17:20 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33137 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Dirk,
I see. I don't think the software will function properly if you screw
this up. Too many things, e.g., serialization and deserialization,
simply won't work if the reflective Ecore model is inconsistent.
On 13/06/2013 5:22 PM, Dirk Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> its just that I am a bit concerned about breaking the EPackage's
> consistency through source code merge operations.
>
> Regards,
> Dirk
>
> Am 13.06.2013 17:12, schrieb Ed Merks:
>> Dirk,
>>
>> No, there isn't such a tool. I'm not sure how it could be inconsistent,
>> unless you hand modified the generated package initialization code (or
>> the serialized version being loaded) to make it inconsistent...
>>
>>
>> On 13/06/2013 3:02 PM, Dirk Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> does anybody know of a tool that consistency checks the generated
>>> EPackageImpl's, e.g. checks that all the EStructuralFeature getters
>>> actually return the feature they promise?
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> Dirk
>>
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03134 seconds