| Default Package [message #1157] |
Sun, 15 April 2007 20:43  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
With Ruby (I assume it's there for the other languages too) there ia always a default package, which
just adds an unnecessary level of indirection. I'd prefer that it wasn't there, any other opinions?
Thanks
Mark
|
|
|
|
| Re: Default Package [message #1211 is a reply to message #1184] |
Mon, 16 April 2007 13:08  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Andrey, yes just the end-user perspective. The concept seems fine in the API.
Andrey Platov wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Short question: do you wish to avoid default package at API level or
> just from end-user experience point of view? My quick and dirty oppinion
> that it would be easy to remove default package visually, but it is
> reasonable to have it in code for logic unification... Guys, please
> share your thoughts and/or correct me.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Andrey
>
> Mark Howe wrote:
>> With Ruby (I assume it's there for the other languages too) there ia
>> always a default package, which just adds an unnecessary level of
>> indirection. I'd prefer that it wasn't there, any other opinions?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mark
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.28517 seconds
Home