|
| Re: eUML2 vs Papyrus [message #1028958 is a reply to message #1028356] |
Fri, 29 March 2013 00:54  |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 33137
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Best to ask on the eclipse.papyrus forum.
On 28/03/2013 2:35 AM, roshni rajagopal wrote:
> Comparing Papyrus & Soyatec eUML2, we preferred Papyrus because
> a) Its more suited for top down modeling while eUML2 asks for coding
> details like package hierarchy before allowing you to create a
> diagram. b)One can easily create a profile in papyrus. We have created
> a database profile in papyrus which shows primary keys etc
> c)Papyrus being part of EMF - is likely to be free and updated
> frequently. While soyatec euml2 is not free in the latest eclipse
> versions.
>
> What are your thoughts on the above. Which is more stable ? Papyrus
> is not very stable and gives lots of null pointer and other exceptions
> - its also in incubator status. How much support & commitment is there
> for making Papyrus a stable and usable tool?
>
> Do share ur experience & recommendations. Also does anyone know if we
> can create a 'database' profile in eUML2>
>
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 2.57577 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
