Eclipse Community Forums: Papyrus » Kepler Nighly Build confusion

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » Papyrus » Kepler Nighly Build confusion

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Kepler Nighly Build confusion [message #1013125]

Fri, 22 February 2013 20:53

Eclipse User

Hi all,

the day before yesterday, I installed the nightly build of Papyrus Kepler.
The timestamp of that build was:

201202201526

I just checked for a new build and found a build with timestamp

201302160600

I guess this is just an upload error?

Regards,

Report message to a moderator

Re: Kepler Nighly Build confusion [message #1013272 is a reply to message #1013125]

Sat, 23 February 2013 06:51

Ed Willink

Messages: 7655
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi

I prefer to download the Update ZIPs [1] and install from there; you
know what you're getting, can review it and repeat it.

Unfortunately there is a bug [2] that many of the 0.10,.. N-builds are
aliases for 0.9... but you see that on the web page as no content.

I think that Papyrus maintains many yearly releases at once, so you
probably got the wrong repo.

Regards

Ed Willink

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/papyrus/downloads/index.php
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=396863

On 22/02/2013 20:53, Florian Wendland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the day before yesterday, I installed the nightly build of Papyrus
> Kepler. The timestamp of that build was:
>
> 201202201526
>
> I just checked for a new build and found a build with timestamp
>
> 201302160600
>
> I guess this is just an upload error?
>
> Regards,

Report message to a moderator

Re: Kepler Nighly Build confusion [message #1013398 is a reply to message #1013272]

Sat, 23 February 2013 15:13

Eclipse User

Ed,

I guess this is rather related to the crash down of the build server. The
build from 20th February worked fine so far.

Regards,
Marc-Florian

"Ed Willink" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:kg9otd$nr4$1@xxxxxxxxe.org...

Hi

I prefer to download the Update ZIPs [1] and install from there; you
know what you're getting, can review it and repeat it.

Unfortunately there is a bug [2] that many of the 0.10,.. N-builds are
aliases for 0.9... but you see that on the web page as no content.

I think that Papyrus maintains many yearly releases at once, so you
probably got the wrong repo.

Regards

Ed Willink

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/papyrus/downloads/index.php
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=396863

On 22/02/2013 20:53, Florian Wendland wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the day before yesterday, I installed the nightly build of Papyrus Kepler.
> The timestamp of that build was:
>
> 201202201526
>
> I just checked for a new build and found a build with timestamp
>
> 201302160600
>
> I guess this is just an upload error?
>
> Regards,

Report message to a moderator

Re: Kepler Nighly Build confusion [message #1014140 is a reply to message #1013398]

Mon, 25 February 2013 08:51

Camille Letavernier

Messages: 952
Registered: February 2011

Senior Member

Hello,

It is indeed related to the recent build server crash. It seems that the latest builds are not promoted. And we've lost a few builds, too (Which explains the rollback from 02/20 build to 02/16).

So currently, the new builds are not available (Neither on the downloads page nor on the nightly update site)

Regards,
Camille

Camille Letavernier

Report message to a moderator

Re: Kepler Nighly Build confusion [message #1014220 is a reply to message #1014140]

Mon, 25 February 2013 11:42

Ed Willink

Messages: 7655
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi

See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401604

The original rteport was not just about 20-Feb but also about 2012/2013;
was that a typo?

Regards

Ed Willink

On 25/02/2013 08:51, Camille Letavernier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is indeed related to the recent build server crash. It seems that
> the latest builds are not promoted. And we've lost a few builds, too
> (Which explains the rollback from 02/20 build to 02/16).
>
> So currently, the new builds are not available (Neither on the
> downloads page nor on the nightly update site)
>
>
> Regards,
> Camille

Report message to a moderator