|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #14362 is a reply to message #13423] |
Fri, 30 January 2009 21:09 |
Eric Dillon Messages: 103 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Marc,
From an import, package names with a <space> shouldn't exist. In fact, we
prohibit <space> in package names, so I suspect from then on Tigerstripe is
confused and can't perform a proper refactor. Not sure why/how you got that
<space> thru the import, as the import is designed to specifically avoid it.
I'll let Richard comment/investigate further.
That being said, we are re-working the refactoring support to enhance
performance and make it a lot more robust. We are actively working on this
(Bug 260907).
Eric
On 1/30/09 10:58 AM, in article
7b8c03ce860b1e4fe999046cb4503a60$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to solve the problem of blank names in packages when imported from
> RSM SID, I refactor my packages, like changing "Logical View" to
> "LogicalView". however, it does not change the package statement of the
> java files.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Refactoring works only partially [message #564262 is a reply to message #13423] |
Fri, 30 January 2009 21:09 |
Eric Dillon Messages: 103 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Marc,
From an import, package names with a <space> shouldn't exist. In fact, we
prohibit <space> in package names, so I suspect from then on Tigerstripe is
confused and can't perform a proper refactor. Not sure why/how you got that
<space> thru the import, as the import is designed to specifically avoid it.
I'll let Richard comment/investigate further.
That being said, we are re-working the refactoring support to enhance
performance and make it a lot more robust. We are actively working on this
(Bug 260907).
Eric
On 1/30/09 10:58 AM, in article
7b8c03ce860b1e4fe999046cb4503a60$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to solve the problem of blank names in packages when imported from
> RSM SID, I refactor my packages, like changing "Logical View" to
> "LogicalView". however, it does not change the package statement of the
> java files.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03015 seconds