|
Re: Using attributes for relations [message #13240 is a reply to message #13134] |
Tue, 27 January 2009 16:36 |
Eric Dillon Messages: 103 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Mark,
Just tried that with 0.4.5, and got the relations without problem with a
profile that has them "turned on".
Could you confirm the version of Tigerstripe you're using. We just released
0.4.5 on Friday.
If so, we need to have a look at the logs to figure what is going on.
Eric
On 1/27/09 7:59 AM, in article
6e718f1ba002aa3ada11953f64ec991a$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a model where some attributes are in fact relations (the old OSS/J
> way of doing).
> However, using Tigerstripe 0.4, the relations do not show in the diagram.
> I tried to modify my profile, chcking "Artifact attributes can be used as
> references" and "Implements relationship" but the realtionships were still
> not showing up in the diagram.
>
> Any idea how to get those?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Using attributes for relations [message #564049 is a reply to message #13134] |
Tue, 27 January 2009 16:36 |
Eric Dillon Messages: 103 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Mark,
Just tried that with 0.4.5, and got the relations without problem with a
profile that has them "turned on".
Could you confirm the version of Tigerstripe you're using. We just released
0.4.5 on Friday.
If so, we need to have a look at the logs to figure what is going on.
Eric
On 1/27/09 7:59 AM, in article
6e718f1ba002aa3ada11953f64ec991a$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a model where some attributes are in fact relations (the old OSS/J
> way of doing).
> However, using Tigerstripe 0.4, the relations do not show in the diagram.
> I tried to modify my profile, chcking "Artifact attributes can be used as
> references" and "Implements relationship" but the realtionships were still
> not showing up in the diagram.
>
> Any idea how to get those?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02254 seconds