Home » Modeling » Epsilon » [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure?
|
Re: [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure? [message #12748 is a reply to message #12727] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 11:57 |
Dimitrios Kolovos Messages: 1776 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michael,
As a workaround you could set border.color="255,255,255" (or whatever
the background color is) to your node. If this doesn't cut it, please
file a bug and we'll look into it asap.
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Michael Moser wrote:
> I would like to specify "nodes" inside a compartment that are just
> represented by their label (i.e. maybe with a prefixed icon, but
> otherwise just a text-line and no surrounding rectangle, ellipse or
> whatever).
>
> I couldn't figure out, how to specify this. Is this possible? If so, a
> hint on how would be appreciated!
>
> Michael
>
>
|
|
|
Re: [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure? [message #12846 is a reply to message #12748] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 12:32 |
Michael Moser Messages: 914 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Dimitris Kolovos wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> As a workaround you could set border.color="255,255,255" (or whatever
> the background color is) to your node. If this doesn't cut it, please
> file a bug and we'll look into it asap.
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitrios
Hm - almost. I had to fiddle somewhat with the size to get a decent
height (because the default figure is too big, esp. to high which causes
very odd looking lists). I guess the drawback with this approach is,
that it now very much depends on the font size used and/or available.
Another problem is, that the horizontal width is now fixed and if one
makes the container very wide, only part of the content is shown. I
guess, that could be overcome that by simply specifying some enormous
width (>= 10000 pixels or so) but ideally that element would "simply"
adapt to the containing element's width (e.g. by specifying a width of 0
or -1).
For now I can live with it, but I guess I'll file an enhancement request
on that one, too.
Michael
|
|
|
Re: [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure? [message #12857 is a reply to message #12846] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 12:40 |
Dimitrios Kolovos Messages: 1776 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michael,
I suspected that some fiddling with the dimensions of the node would be
needed. Please do file the bug and I'll start looking for a proper
solution to this.
Cheers,
Dimitris
Michael Moser wrote:
> Dimitris Kolovos wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> As a workaround you could set border.color="255,255,255" (or whatever
>> the background color is) to your node. If this doesn't cut it, please
>> file a bug and we'll look into it asap.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitrios
>
> Hm - almost. I had to fiddle somewhat with the size to get a decent
> height (because the default figure is too big, esp. to high which causes
> very odd looking lists). I guess the drawback with this approach is,
> that it now very much depends on the font size used and/or available.
>
> Another problem is, that the horizontal width is now fixed and if one
> makes the container very wide, only part of the content is shown. I
> guess, that could be overcome that by simply specifying some enormous
> width (>= 10000 pixels or so) but ideally that element would "simply"
> adapt to the containing element's width (e.g. by specifying a width of 0
> or -1).
>
> For now I can live with it, but I guess I'll file an enhancement request
> on that one, too.
>
> Michael
>
|
|
| |
Re: [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure? [message #565437 is a reply to message #12727] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 11:57 |
Dimitrios Kolovos Messages: 1776 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michael,
As a workaround you could set border.color="255,255,255" (or whatever
the background color is) to your node. If this doesn't cut it, please
file a bug and we'll look into it asap.
Cheers,
Dimitrios
Michael Moser wrote:
> I would like to specify "nodes" inside a compartment that are just
> represented by their label (i.e. maybe with a prefixed icon, but
> otherwise just a text-line and no surrounding rectangle, ellipse or
> whatever).
>
> I couldn't figure out, how to specify this. Is this possible? If so, a
> hint on how would be appreciated!
>
> Michael
>
>
|
|
|
Re: [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure? [message #565560 is a reply to message #12748] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 12:32 |
Michael Moser Messages: 914 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Dimitris Kolovos wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> As a workaround you could set border.color="255,255,255" (or whatever
> the background color is) to your node. If this doesn't cut it, please
> file a bug and we'll look into it asap.
>
> Cheers,
> Dimitrios
Hm - almost. I had to fiddle somewhat with the size to get a decent
height (because the default figure is too big, esp. to high which causes
very odd looking lists). I guess the drawback with this approach is,
that it now very much depends on the font size used and/or available.
Another problem is, that the horizontal width is now fixed and if one
makes the container very wide, only part of the content is shown. I
guess, that could be overcome that by simply specifying some enormous
width (>= 10000 pixels or so) but ideally that element would "simply"
adapt to the containing element's width (e.g. by specifying a width of 0
or -1).
For now I can live with it, but I guess I'll file an enhancement request
on that one, too.
Michael
|
|
|
Re: [Eugenia] How to specify nodes without a figure? [message #565586 is a reply to message #12846] |
Tue, 17 February 2009 12:40 |
Dimitrios Kolovos Messages: 1776 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michael,
I suspected that some fiddling with the dimensions of the node would be
needed. Please do file the bug and I'll start looking for a proper
solution to this.
Cheers,
Dimitris
Michael Moser wrote:
> Dimitris Kolovos wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> As a workaround you could set border.color="255,255,255" (or whatever
>> the background color is) to your node. If this doesn't cut it, please
>> file a bug and we'll look into it asap.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitrios
>
> Hm - almost. I had to fiddle somewhat with the size to get a decent
> height (because the default figure is too big, esp. to high which causes
> very odd looking lists). I guess the drawback with this approach is,
> that it now very much depends on the font size used and/or available.
>
> Another problem is, that the horizontal width is now fixed and if one
> makes the container very wide, only part of the content is shown. I
> guess, that could be overcome that by simply specifying some enormous
> width (>= 10000 pixels or so) but ideally that element would "simply"
> adapt to the containing element's width (e.g. by specifying a width of 0
> or -1).
>
> For now I can live with it, but I guess I'll file an enhancement request
> on that one, too.
>
> Michael
>
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Apr 25 15:21:54 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03700 seconds
|