|
| Re: Access by method name (xxxxx) (not by proxy) requires a receiver. [message #126681 is a reply to message #126656] |
Wed, 21 June 2006 10:15  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com
It typically means you had a call to a local method. You can try putting
"this.xxx" in front, but if the method is defined in the class being
edited and not in the superclass then it can't be called during VE
editing time. That is because we can't instantiate an instance of the
class being edited since it is constantly changing. So instead we
instantiate the superclass and then try to interpret the class being
edited. We can handle calls to get methods that we know return beans,
but we can't call general methods since the class isn't actually
instantiated and running.
Hung wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know what this message is about? and How to fix it? Thanks.
--
Thanks,
Rich Kulp
|
|
|
| Re: Access by method name (xxxxx) (not by proxy) requires a receiver. [message #613384 is a reply to message #126656] |
Wed, 21 June 2006 10:15 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com
It typically means you had a call to a local method. You can try putting
"this.xxx" in front, but if the method is defined in the class being
edited and not in the superclass then it can't be called during VE
editing time. That is because we can't instantiate an instance of the
class being edited since it is constantly changing. So instead we
instantiate the superclass and then try to interpret the class being
edited. We can handle calls to get methods that we know return beans,
but we can't call general methods since the class isn't actually
instantiated and running.
Hung wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone know what this message is about? and How to fix it? Thanks.
--
Thanks,
Rich Kulp
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08564 seconds
Home