Eclipse Community Forums: Sapphire » 2-element XSD sequence model implementation

Help

Home

Home » Archived » Sapphire » 2-element XSD sequence model implementation

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

2-element XSD sequence model implementation [message #830410]

Tue, 27 March 2012 15:33

Roded Bahat

Messages: 152
Registered: August 2011

Senior Member

Hi,
I'm trying to model the following XSD in Sapphire:

<xs:element name="resources">
    <xs:complexType>
        <xs:sequence>
	    <xs:element name="locale" type="Locale"></xs:element>
	    <xs:element name="bundle" maxOccurs="unbounded" type="ResourceBundle"></xs:element>
        </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>
</xs:element>

I'd like the locale & bundle elements to have a 1:1 relationship, so I've created a container model element (IResourceLocaleBundle) which holds an implied element for each child element ("locale" and "bundle").

Parent list:

	// *** ResourceLocaleBundles ***
	@Type(base = IResourceLocaleBundle.class)
	@Label(standard = "Resource Locale Bundles")
	ListProperty PROP_RESOURCE_LOCALE_BUNDLES = new ListProperty(TYPE, "ResourceLocaleBundles");
	ModelElementList<IResourceLocaleBundle> getResourceLocaleBundles();

Now, I'd like to bind the parent list property and IResourceLocaleBundle to nothing so that the locale and bundle elements appear coupled directly under the root element.
Should I be implementing a custom list & element binding impl for this purpose? Is there a better way to accomplish this?
I'd appreciate any comments.
Thanks,
Roded

Report message to a moderator

Re: 2-element XSD sequence model implementation [message #830464 is a reply to message #830410]

Tue, 27 March 2012 17:08

Konstantin Komissarchik

Messages: 1077
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Not quite understanding all aspects of your question, but based purely on your schema snippet... I would likely create

IResources (bound to "resources" element)
{
    Locale (implied element property bound to "locale" element)
    Bundles (list property bound to "bundle" elements)
}

None of the above should require a custom binding.

- Konstantin

Report message to a moderator