|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #8810 is a reply to message #8774] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 18:33   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> To begin the week with interesting discussions, there are new use cases
> added to Wiki for commenting:
>
> - Build the project (priority 1, modified from an earlier post in this
> newsgroup)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-build-project
>
> - Edit source code (priority 1)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-edit-source-code
>
> - Create a new class (priority 2, updated to wiki from an earlier post in
> this newsgroup
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-create-class
>
> - Sign the application (priority 2)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-sign-application
>
> These use cases do not currently have a responsible owner, so we will update
> them according to discussions before an owner is agreed. If you would like
> to provide more input to these use cases or become an owner, please inform
> us. All comments are welcomed.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
Hi Minna,
Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
:Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #8824 is a reply to message #8817] |
Thu, 01 December 2005 17:13 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Good to hear from you Steve,
> and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
>
> We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
> wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
> comment the proposal as well if you like.
>
> In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
> in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
> the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
> after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
> described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
> feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
>
> The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
> the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
> functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
> describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
> better.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
>>Hi Minna,
>>
>>Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
>>I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>>
>>Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>>
>>I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>>
>>:Steven in Dallas
>
>
>
>
Hi Minna,
Thanks for the clarifications and the link to updates.
I'll check everything out and get back to you in this "chain" of posts.
:Steven
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #10861 is a reply to message #8817] |
Fri, 02 December 2005 21:11 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Good to hear from you Steve,
> and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
>
> We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
> wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
> comment the proposal as well if you like.
>
> In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
> in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
> the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
> after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
> described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
> feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
>
> The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
> the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
> functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
> describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
> better.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
>>Hi Minna,
>>
>>Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
>>I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>>
>>Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>>
>>I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>>
>>:Steven in Dallas
>
>
>
>
Moi Minna,
I can be the "owner" of the "Edit source code" part.
I will think about things related to the use case you've put together so
far and make some additional proposals next week.
:Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #562915 is a reply to message #8774] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 18:33 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> To begin the week with interesting discussions, there are new use cases
> added to Wiki for commenting:
>
> - Build the project (priority 1, modified from an earlier post in this
> newsgroup)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-build-project
>
> - Edit source code (priority 1)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-edit-source-code
>
> - Create a new class (priority 2, updated to wiki from an earlier post in
> this newsgroup
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-create-class
>
> - Sign the application (priority 2)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-sign-application
>
> These use cases do not currently have a responsible owner, so we will update
> them according to discussions before an owner is agreed. If you would like
> to provide more input to these use cases or become an owner, please inform
> us. All comments are welcomed.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
Hi Minna,
Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
:Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #563019 is a reply to message #8817] |
Thu, 01 December 2005 17:13 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Good to hear from you Steve,
> and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
>
> We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
> wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
> comment the proposal as well if you like.
>
> In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
> in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
> the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
> after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
> described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
> feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
>
> The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
> the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
> functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
> describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
> better.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
>>Hi Minna,
>>
>>Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
>>I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>>
>>Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>>
>>I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>>
>>:Steven in Dallas
>
>
>
>
Hi Minna,
Thanks for the clarifications and the link to updates.
I'll check everything out and get back to you in this "chain" of posts.
:Steven
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #563099 is a reply to message #8817] |
Fri, 02 December 2005 21:11 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Good to hear from you Steve,
> and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
>
> We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
> wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
> comment the proposal as well if you like.
>
> In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
> in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
> the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
> after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
> described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
> feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
>
> The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
> the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
> functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
> describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
> better.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
>>Hi Minna,
>>
>>Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
>>I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>>
>>Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>>
>>I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>>
>>:Steven in Dallas
>
>
>
>
Moi Minna,
I can be the "owner" of the "Edit source code" part.
I will think about things related to the use case you've put together so
far and make some additional proposals next week.
:Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04618 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
