Home » Eclipse Projects » DSDP - Target Management » Re: RSE 1.0.1: Persisting property sets of an IHost
| Re: RSE 1.0.1: Persisting property sets of an IHost [message #7947] |
Thu, 10 May 2007 09:49  |
 Martin Oberhuber
Messages: 1007
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello Andreas,
this is a question specific to Target Management, so I'm cross-posting
to the eclipse.dsdp.tm newsgroup; please use that newsgroup for
follow-up questions.
I think that your problem is actually a known bug fixed for TM 2.0M6, see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=150115
Can you upgrade to the recent TM 2.0 milestones? M7 is coming next week,
and from then on the API will be frozen. There's been a lot of API
changes so if you have much code already you'll need to migrate it; the
build notes give initial help doing so, but full migration docs yet need
to be written.
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
Andreas Schik wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am adding a property set to a connection (IHost) and using the
> commit() method of IHost they are persisted onto disk (I verified that
> in the file system). That is what I expected, so far so good. The
> question now is, how to retrieve them from disk. If I call
> getPropertySet() on the respective IHost the property set is not there.
> It is still on disk, but it is obviously not loaded. How do I do that?
> Thanks
> Andreas
|
|
|
| Re: RSE 1.0.1: Persisting property sets of an IHost [message #8853 is a reply to message #7947] |
Thu, 10 May 2007 12:02  |
Andreas Schik
Messages: 12
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello Martin,
Am 10.05.2007, 10:49 Uhr, schrieb Martin Oberhuber =
<martin.oberhuber@windriver.com>:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> this is a question specific to Target Management, so I'm cross-posting=
=
> to the eclipse.dsdp.tm newsgroup; please use that newsgroup for =
> follow-up questions.
>
> I think that your problem is actually a known bug fixed for TM 2.0M6, =
see
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D150115
yes, it seems to be the same. Sorry for not checking the bug reports clo=
se =
enough.
> Can you upgrade to the recent TM 2.0 milestones? M7 is coming next wee=
k, =
> and from then on the API will be frozen. There's been a lot of API =
> changes so if you have much code already you'll need to migrate it; th=
e =
> build notes give initial help doing so, but full migration docs yet ne=
ed =
> to be written.
Actually, I went for another solution, as my first approach using host =
properties would have brought other problems for me. Hence, I dropped th=
is =
idea.
I appreciate your help anyway. Thanks.
Andreas
|
|
|
| Re: RSE 1.0.1: Persisting property sets of an IHost [message #567204 is a reply to message #7947] |
Thu, 10 May 2007 12:02 |
Andreas Schik
Messages: 12
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello Martin,
Am 10.05.2007, 10:49 Uhr, schrieb Martin Oberhuber =
<martin.oberhuber@windriver.com>:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> this is a question specific to Target Management, so I'm cross-posting=
=
> to the eclipse.dsdp.tm newsgroup; please use that newsgroup for =
> follow-up questions.
>
> I think that your problem is actually a known bug fixed for TM 2.0M6, =
see
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D150115
yes, it seems to be the same. Sorry for not checking the bug reports clo=
se =
enough.
> Can you upgrade to the recent TM 2.0 milestones? M7 is coming next wee=
k, =
> and from then on the API will be frozen. There's been a lot of API =
> changes so if you have much code already you'll need to migrate it; th=
e =
> build notes give initial help doing so, but full migration docs yet ne=
ed =
> to be written.
Actually, I went for another solution, as my first approach using host =
properties would have brought other problems for me. Hence, I dropped th=
is =
idea.
I appreciate your help anyway. Thanks.
Andreas
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Apr 23 07:45:01 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03205 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
