|
Re: Tree of cascaded parameters [message #735687 is a reply to message #735620] |
Wed, 12 October 2011 14:26 |
|
Alexey,
What do you mean by limited to? Each level in a cascade can be very
dynamic, but it should have some correlation to the level above and below.
Jason
On 10/12/2011 8:05 AM, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that cascaded parameters are limited to
> constant nesting level? So that if I have a tree of employees, I can't
> pick an employee, then his subordinate, then his subordinate, etc. until
> hitting the one I need information for?
|
|
|
Re: Tree of cascaded parameters [message #735716 is a reply to message #735620] |
Wed, 12 October 2011 14:26 |
|
Alexey,
What do you mean by limited to? Each level in a cascade can be very
dynamic, but it should have some correlation to the level above and below.
Jason
On 10/12/2011 8:05 AM, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that cascaded parameters are limited to
> constant nesting level? So that if I have a tree of employees, I can't
> pick an employee, then his subordinate, then his subordinate, etc. until
> hitting the one I need information for?
|
|
|
|
Re: Tree of cascaded parameters [message #735739 is a reply to message #735723] |
Wed, 12 October 2011 15:24 |
|
Yes you are correct.
Jason
On 10/12/2011 11:20 AM, Alexey Romanov wrote:
> I mean that the number of levels in a cascade has to be fixed in
> advance, so we can't decide whether there is a next level of cascade
> depending on value of current level.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03936 seconds