|
|
| Re: [ATL] creating aggregation relation between model elements [message #79272 is a reply to message #79258] |
Tue, 15 April 2008 15:43  |
 Luis Pedro
Messages: 29
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi,
Thanks. I was not aware of that source of information! I was able to
solve the problem.
Again, thanks.
Best regards,
Luis Pedro
William Piers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I put some indications inside your code :
>
> Luis Pedro a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>> I'm creating some transformation rules in ATL and I've the problem
>> that I'm not being able to create containment (aggregation) relations
>> between elements in the target model. This two of the rules I'm using:
>>
>> rule init {
>> from
>> enumerations : enumerationDC!EnumerationDC
>> to
>> coopnpackage: COOPNMetaModel!COOPNPackage(
>> name <- 'COOPN_Enum_Package'
> ownedModules <- -- put here an OCL expression retrieving --
> the list of enumerationDC!DCEnum, later transformed into coopnadt,
> -- that you want to link with coopnpackage.
> -- this may be a kind of : ownedModules <- enumerations.ownedDCEnum
>> )
>> }
>>
>> rule ADT {
>> from
>> dc : enumerationDC!DCEnum
>> to
>> coopnadt: COOPNMetaModel!"COOPNMetamodel::ADTModule::COOPNADT"(
>> name<- dc.name
>> ) }
>>
>> COOPNMetaModel!COOPNPackage and COOPNMetamodel::ADTModule::COOPNADT
>> are related with each other by a 0..* aggregation (named
>> "ownedModules") with COOPNMetaModel!COOPNPackage as the EContaining
>> Class.
>>
>> Any hint on how can now associate the created coopnadt to the
>> previously created coopnpackage by the ownedModules aggregation?
>>
>
> In order top better understand ATL implicit traceability links (between
> source and target model elements) I advise you to read those kind of
> simple examples : http://www.eclipse.org/m2m/atl/basicExamples_Patterns/
>
> Best Regards,
>
> William
>
>> Thanks very much in advance for your time and help.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Luis Pedro
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02345 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
