Home » Archived » Tigerstripe » Class Diagram problems
| | | | |
Re: Class Diagram problems [message #6612 is a reply to message #6594] |
Tue, 11 March 2008 11:01 |
Eric Dillon Messages: 103 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
See my comments inline.
Eric
"Marc Flauw" <marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote in message
news:80bb8c6e1bd2b6dcb8f50bccdd53c821$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Eric,
>
> OK, I did that, but the results are surprising.
> After loading the profile, I saw no change on the diagram. I had to delete
> and recreate the object (Tracking Record).
Ok. It seems we have a bug open on this.
> Then all the attributes were showing up, but Tracking Record had 2
> relationships with Service Problem, as Service Problem contains 2
> attributes of type Tracking Record and those 2 relationships were gone. So
> changing the profile is not perfect and not really what I want.
Well... this is the dilemna we have now with all OSSJ APIs. The
"relationships" that you are refering to are really "References", where they
should really be represented using proper Associations. We've brought that
up to the attention of Vincent and I believe it is important that this
modeling "convention" is straightened up going forward (especially setting
the context for TIP). I suggest setting up a call with Richard, Vincent,
maybe Jerome and others. I'll send you an email offline.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
| | | | | |
Re: Class Diagram problems [message #562301 is a reply to message #6594] |
Tue, 11 March 2008 11:01 |
Eric Dillon Messages: 103 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
See my comments inline.
Eric
"Marc Flauw" <marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote in message
news:80bb8c6e1bd2b6dcb8f50bccdd53c821$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Eric,
>
> OK, I did that, but the results are surprising.
> After loading the profile, I saw no change on the diagram. I had to delete
> and recreate the object (Tracking Record).
Ok. It seems we have a bug open on this.
> Then all the attributes were showing up, but Tracking Record had 2
> relationships with Service Problem, as Service Problem contains 2
> attributes of type Tracking Record and those 2 relationships were gone. So
> changing the profile is not perfect and not really what I want.
Well... this is the dilemna we have now with all OSSJ APIs. The
"relationships" that you are refering to are really "References", where they
should really be represented using proper Associations. We've brought that
up to the attention of Vincent and I believe it is important that this
modeling "convention" is straightened up going forward (especially setting
the context for TIP). I suggest setting up a call with Richard, Vincent,
maybe Jerome and others. I'll send you an email offline.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Apr 23 07:56:58 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04096 seconds
|