|
| Re: Birt mavenization [message #691522 is a reply to message #691463] |
Fri, 01 July 2011 16:16   |
|
Tomas,
I know Scott Rosenbaum was looking at this as well. I think this would
be a good thing. If you want send me an email and I can send you his
contact details.
jasonweathersby at windstream dot net
Jason
On 7/1/2011 10:02 AM, Tikus wrote:
> Hi
>
> i'd like to offer help in mavenizing report engine.
> It would be great to create maven dependencies so that we split
> deployment libraries into core libs and enablements for each database
> (maybe other criteria). The idea is to not include libs that we dont
> need in our application.
>
> It would also be helpful to create Readme with description of each
> library under reportengine/lib to help developers pick only what they
> really need or help those who want to integrate it into other systems.
>
> If i overlooked anything - sorry in advance!
>
> I thought that deployment would be simplified in 3.7 to one jar.
> Unfortunately it didnt make it that far. Never mind.
> See ya
> Tomas
|
|
|
| Re: Birt mavenization [message #870501 is a reply to message #691522] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 12:59 |
 Tom Eugelink
Messages: 817
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
On 2011-07-01 18:16, Jason Weathersby wrote:
> Tomas,
>
> I know Scott Rosenbaum was looking at this as well. I think this would be a good thing. If you want send me an email and I can send you his contact details.
>
I was wondering if this process is making any progress, this thread is from July 2011. Not that I want to push anyone, this probably is all spare time work, but no hurt in asking.
And I would believe that creating some POM's for the runtime jars and uploading the bunch to a repo, even a private one, should not be that big of an issue. But I'm probably missing something.
For now I've settled on using the 3.7.1 uploaded to Sonatype, but I found that the viewservlets artifact is missing. Is that not considered a runtime artifact?
FYI: I'm a total Birt newbie, just trying to add it to my existing webapp project for the first time.
With regards,
Tom
|
|
|
| Re: Birt mavenization [message #870588 is a reply to message #870501] |
Tue, 08 May 2012 20:49 |
|
Tom,
We should have the runtime being uploaded with each new build starting
with the release this June. Currently viewservlets artifact is not part
of this. It is just the report/design/chart engines. You may want to
have a look at this thread:
http://www.birt-exchange.org/org/forum/index.php/topic/24196-mavenizing-birt-3-7-1/page__s__209b06d696e7c80615e2fa9eef9f1a01
Jason
On 5/8/2012 8:59 AM, tbee wrote:
> On 2011-07-01 18:16, Jason Weathersby wrote:
>> Tomas,
>>
>> I know Scott Rosenbaum was looking at this as well. I think this would
>> be a good thing. If you want send me an email and I can send you his
>> contact details.
>>
>
> I was wondering if this process is making any progress, this thread is
> from July 2011. Not that I want to push anyone, this probably is all
> spare time work, but no hurt in asking.
> And I would believe that creating some POM's for the runtime jars and
> uploading the bunch to a repo, even a private one, should not be that
> big of an issue. But I'm probably missing something.
>
> For now I've settled on using the 3.7.1 uploaded to Sonatype, but I
> found that the viewservlets artifact is missing. Is that not considered
> a runtime artifact?
>
> FYI: I'm a total Birt newbie, just trying to add it to my existing
> webapp project for the first time.
>
> With regards,
>
> Tom
|
|
|
|
| Re: Birt mavenization [message #870806 is a reply to message #870636] |
Wed, 09 May 2012 18:29 |
|
If you like you could add a bugzilla entry for this.
Jason
On 5/9/2012 3:26 AM, tbee wrote:
>
> On 2012-05-08 22:49, Jason Weathersby wrote:
>> We should have the runtime being uploaded with each new build starting
>> with the release this June. Currently viewservlets artifact is not
>> part of this. It is just the report/design/chart engines. You may want
>> to have a look at this thread:
>
> Ah, yes, this is where I got the 3.7.1 artifact info from.
>
> Adding the viewservlets is not that complex, I've now done it using an
> in-project repo; it's a single jar with a pom with two dependencies
> (Axis and a commons). Should be easy to include...
>
> Tom
>
>
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01957 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
