|
|
(no subject) [message #675655 is a reply to message #675449] |
Wed, 01 June 2011 06:33 |
Simon Messages: 10 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
On 5/31/2011 4:49 PM, Lance E Sloan wrote:
> I don't know, but I agree that it seems to be abandoned. Hopefully it's
> just temporary. I read a good article about the difference between PDT
> and PHPEclipse. The basic difference is that PDT comes from Zend Studio.
> The folks at Zend don't put very much effort into PDT because they would
> rather have us buy and use Zend Studio rather than Eclipse. Call me
> cynical, but I don't expect a lot of advancement in PDT features. It's
> been said that those that coordinate the PDT project don't accept
> patches for it, especially if it includes new features.
>
> I've tried PHPEclipse and I found it better in some ways, worse in
> others. I settled on using PDT because its word completion is better. I
> wish I knew Java much better and had more for personal development. I'd
> love to improve PHPEclipse.
Hum, that's a bit of a shame really.
I have been looking after my site for a few years using nothing more
than Notepad++ but over the past month or so, I have been using PDT.
I would hate to get used to a new tool that is no longer supported.
Having said that I am happy with what it offers now, so even with no
updates I can live with the one or two current bugs, (and work around
the big bugs).
Personally I think that PHPEdit and Zend studio are far too expensive
for what they offer, (I mean, $299 is a bit on the steep side I think).
I don't mind spending a buck or two, but for a week-end developer this
is a bit much.
Can you suggest any other IDE that I could look into?
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
(no subject) [message #683293 is a reply to message #675449] |
Mon, 13 June 2011 12:43 |
|
On 05/31/2011 04:49 PM, Lance E Sloan wrote:
> I don't know, but I agree that it seems to be abandoned. Hopefully it's
> just temporary. I read a good article about the difference between PDT
> and PHPEclipse. The basic difference is that PDT comes from Zend Studio.
> The folks at Zend don't put very much effort into PDT because they would
> rather have us buy and use Zend Studio rather than Eclipse. Call me
> cynical, but I don't expect a lot of advancement in PDT features. It's
> been said that those that coordinate the PDT project don't accept
> patches for it, especially if it includes new features.
>
> I've tried PHPEclipse and I found it better in some ways, worse in
> others. I settled on using PDT because its word completion is better. I
> wish I knew Java much better and had more for personal development. I'd
> love to improve PHPEclipse.
does PHPEclipse support debugging of php scripts and pages?
thanks
Lore
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it
TDD Book: https://leanpub.com/tdd-buildautomation-ci
Xtext Book: https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/implementing-domain-specific-languages-xtext-and-xtend-second-edition
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03965 seconds