|
|
|
| (no subject) [message #686121 is a reply to message #665289] |
Mon, 20 June 2011 13:26   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Dennis Schladebeck
On 14.04.2011 09:40, aca wrote:
> It's a good start, thanks! :)
> But there are more types, if someone knows anything about them I will be even more grateful...
>
> The font size list contains the following types:
> Large (11 -> 14,5 pt)
> Larger
> Medium (9 -> 12 pt)
> Small (7.5 -> 10 pt)
> Smaller
> XLarge
> XSmall
> XXLarge
> XXSmall
Any updates on this ?
|
|
|
|
| (no subject) [message #686421 is a reply to message #686124] |
Wed, 22 June 2011 08:08 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Dennis Schladebeck
On 20.06.2011 16:50, Jason Weathersby wrote:
> Dennis
>
> Have you seen these bugs:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=319815
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=322103
>
> Jason
>
>
> On 6/20/2011 9:26 AM, Dennis Schladebeck wrote:
>> On 14.04.2011 09:40, aca wrote:
>>> It's a good start, thanks! :)
>>> But there are more types, if someone knows anything about them I will
>>> be even more grateful...
>>>
>>> The font size list contains the following types:
>>> Large (11 -> 14,5 pt)
>>> Larger
>>> Medium (9 -> 12 pt)
>>> Small (7.5 -> 10 pt)
>>> Smaller
>>> XLarge
>>> XSmall
>>> XXLarge
>>> XXSmall
>> Any updates on this ?
>
Thx Jason,
still would be good to have a complete mapping list, from old sizes to new ones, since
a lot of ppl were running into the same problem while upgrading to 2.6
I will probably regex-replace all size aliases with definition in points in my reports.
Dennis
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03684 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
