Eclipse Community Forums: AspectJ » Problem with AJDT in eclipse 3.2

Help

Home

Home » Language IDEs » AspectJ » Problem with AJDT in eclipse 3.2

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Problem with AJDT in eclipse 3.2 [message #65716]

Tue, 13 June 2006 23:24

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: sbederml.gmail.com

Hi,

I'm trying to add aspect to an existing plugin project. The way I'm
doing it is for org.eclipse.search plugin:

1) Importing the plugin with linked content mode;
2) Converting the plugin project to AspectJ project;
3) Setting the AspectJ Out Jar to woven.jar;
4) Adding org.eclipse.search.jar to the AspectJ InPath;
5) Replacing org.eclipse.search.jar with woven.jar in the build path;
6) Creating source folder in the imported project and putting aspects
within it.

The problem is that when I run the plugin project in eclipse 3.1 the
aspects are woven into it, but when I run it from eclipse 3.2RC4-RC7 the
search option becomes not available. I'm also using the latest AJDT version.

Is this a bug in eclipse 3.2 or in AJDT?
How can I make it work in eclipse 3.2?

Thank you in advance,

Michael

Report message to a moderator

Re: Problem with AJDT in eclipse 3.2 [message #65740 is a reply to message #65716]

Wed, 14 June 2006 12:12

Matt Chapman

Messages: 429
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Michael,

It sounds like something is preventing the plug-in from starting, but
it's hard to guess what that might be. Check you check for errors in the
log (Window > Show View > Error Log) to see if that gives any clues?

Regards,

Matt.

Michael Beder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to add aspect to an existing plugin project. The way I'm
> doing it is for org.eclipse.search plugin:
>
> 1) Importing the plugin with linked content mode;
> 2) Converting the plugin project to AspectJ project;
> 3) Setting the AspectJ Out Jar to woven.jar;
> 4) Adding org.eclipse.search.jar to the AspectJ InPath;
> 5) Replacing org.eclipse.search.jar with woven.jar in the build path;
> 6) Creating source folder in the imported project and putting aspects
> within it.
>
> The problem is that when I run the plugin project in eclipse 3.1 the
> aspects are woven into it, but when I run it from eclipse 3.2RC4-RC7 the
> search option becomes not available. I'm also using the latest AJDT
> version.
>
> Is this a bug in eclipse 3.2 or in AJDT?
> How can I make it work in eclipse 3.2?
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Michael

Report message to a moderator

Re: Problem with AJDT in eclipse 3.2 [message #65762 is a reply to message #65740]

Fri, 16 June 2006 00:37

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: sbederml.gmail.com

Hi Matt,

Indeed the problem was

Plug-in org.eclipse.search was unable to load class
org.eclipse.search.internal.ui.OpenSearchDialogAction.

I have replaced org.eclipse.search.jar with woven.jar in the classpath
(using Runtime tab in the manifest editor), and it works now.

Thank you very much,

Michael

Matt Chapman wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> It sounds like something is preventing the plug-in from starting, but
> it's hard to guess what that might be. Check you check for errors in the
> log (Window > Show View > Error Log) to see if that gives any clues?
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
>
> Michael Beder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to add aspect to an existing plugin project. The way I'm
>> doing it is for org.eclipse.search plugin:
>>
>> 1) Importing the plugin with linked content mode;
>> 2) Converting the plugin project to AspectJ project;
>> 3) Setting the AspectJ Out Jar to woven.jar;
>> 4) Adding org.eclipse.search.jar to the AspectJ InPath;
>> 5) Replacing org.eclipse.search.jar with woven.jar in the build path;
>> 6) Creating source folder in the imported project and putting aspects
>> within it.
>>
>> The problem is that when I run the plugin project in eclipse 3.1 the
>> aspects are woven into it, but when I run it from eclipse 3.2RC4-RC7
>> the search option becomes not available. I'm also using the latest
>> AJDT version.
>>
>> Is this a bug in eclipse 3.2 or in AJDT?
>> How can I make it work in eclipse 3.2?
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>>
>> Michael

Report message to a moderator