Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » EMF "Technology" (Ecore Tools, EMFatic, etc)  » why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2)
why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2) [message #64222] Sun, 10 December 2006 15:23 Go to next message
Victor Volle is currently offline Victor VolleFriend
Messages: 6
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Hello,

I am curious why the JET syntax changed from JET1 to JET2.
I always liked the simplicity of the JET1 syntax and see no obvious reason
to move to
an XML-like syntax, moving away from a well known JSP-like template
language.

Bye
Victor

PS:
could you please reply to
v.volle _ at _ computer.org
as well

Report message to a moderator

Re: why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2) [message #64245 is a reply to message #64222] Mon, 11 December 2006 13:12 Go to previous message
Paul Elder is currently offline Paul ElderFriend
Messages: 849
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Victor:

The JET2 syntax changes were made to support tag library support.

That said, I am working on integrating 100% compatibility with the JET1
syntax, and most importantly, compatibility with the generated Java classes.

Paul


"Victor Volle" <v.volle@computer.org> wrote in message
news:elh8nd$6ga$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> I am curious why the JET syntax changed from JET1 to JET2.
> I always liked the simplicity of the JET1 syntax and see no obvious reason
> to move to
> an XML-like syntax, moving away from a well known JSP-like template
> language.
>
> Bye
> Victor
>
> PS:
> could you please reply to
> v.volle _ at _ computer.org
> as well
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2) [message #596758 is a reply to message #64222] Mon, 11 December 2006 13:12 Go to previous message
Paul Elder is currently offline Paul ElderFriend
Messages: 849
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Victor:

The JET2 syntax changes were made to support tag library support.

That said, I am working on integrating 100% compatibility with the JET1
syntax, and most importantly, compatibility with the generated Java classes.

Paul


"Victor Volle" <v.volle@computer.org> wrote in message
news:elh8nd$6ga$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hello,
>
> I am curious why the JET syntax changed from JET1 to JET2.
> I always liked the simplicity of the JET1 syntax and see no obvious reason
> to move to
> an XML-like syntax, moving away from a well known JSP-like template
> language.
>
> Bye
> Victor
>
> PS:
> could you please reply to
> v.volle _ at _ computer.org
> as well
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:why did the JET Syntax change (JET1 vs. JET2)
Next Topic:Error validating with ecore.xsd
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 25 13:47:25 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02862 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly