Eclipse Community Forums: UML2 » No value in upperValue/lowerValue

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » UML2 » No value in upperValue/lowerValue - meaning?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

No value in upperValue/lowerValue - meaning? [message #624056]

Wed, 25 July 2007 13:57

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: user.domain.invalid

Dear All,

I am just finishing off my XSLT for the compare tool & wrt
cardinalities/multiplicities I am stuck for some exact wording.

Basically is I run into a change etc in a multiplicity e.g.

<upperValue xmi:type="uml:LiteralUnlimitedNatural"
xmi:id="_WC4sUTqoEdyMeJ3mr5tnmg" value="1"/>

Then I can grab the value attribute & say "value =".

However if the value is the default it is not put in e.g.

<lowerValue xmi:type="uml:LiteralInteger"
xmi:id="_WC4sUDqoEdyMeJ3mr5tnmg"/>

So what would the the "UML correct" wording for when an upper or lower
value has no value?

Default? No Value?

TIA

Adam

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	untyped property of a stereotype
Next Topic:	untyped property of a stereotype

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Thu Apr 25 15:07:05 GMT 2024

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter