Why example plugins are required to use ECF? [message #619774] |
Sun, 28 October 2007 22:20 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: hiroki.kondo.change-vision.com
Hi.
I think JoinGroupWizardAction and SelectProviderAction sholud be
included in ECF core feature.Why JoinGroupWizardAction and
SelectProviderAction are included in example Plug-in?
Example Plug-ins are reference implementation,isn't it?
So, It is not necessary to use ECF Feature.
And I look forward to use necessary Actions to use ECF.
I found these Action. These Actions are nessesary to use
ECF Communication Perspective.
I want to these Actions are included in ECF Core Features,
and I want to delete unnecessary Feature to use ECF, for example,
Robot Plugin, that is sample implementation to develop on ECF.
|
|
|
Re: Why example plugins are required to use ECF? [message #619789 is a reply to message #619774] |
Tue, 30 October 2007 12:11 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: remy.suen.gmail.com
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:20:07 +0900, HirokiKondo wrote:
> I think JoinGroupWizardAction and SelectProviderAction sholud be
> included in ECF core feature.Why JoinGroupWizardAction and
> SelectProviderAction are included in example Plug-in?
I think they're not included because they are UI elements which have
nothing to do with the "core".
> I want to these Actions are included in ECF Core Features,
> and I want to delete unnecessary Feature to use ECF, for example,
> Robot Plugin, that is sample implementation to develop on ECF.
If you have comments about how we should structure our features, please
bring it up on the ecf-dev mailing list and/or open a bug.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=ECF
Regards,
Rem
|
|
|
Re: Why example plugins are required to use ECF? [message #619791 is a reply to message #619789] |
Wed, 31 October 2007 07:51 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mkuppe.versant.com
Remy Chi Jian Suen wrote:
>
> If you have comments about how we should structure our features, please
> bring it up on the ecf-dev mailing list and/or open a bug.
Let me quote Scott on ECF features in another bug...
> Doing *this* feature refactoring is a bigger (but still
> desireable/necessary) thing...but this also has some interactions with the
> Equinox Provisioning work for 3.4. That is, the Equinox provisioning work will
> obsolete the Eclipse 'features' and so it might make more sense to focus on
> using the new provisioning work to create an set of ECF 'installable units'
> (concept from Equinox provisioning). [1]
So please fill bug reports, but be warned that we might have no chance
to fix it before we switch to IUs.
Regards,
Markus
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=204414#c1
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01967 seconds